Jump to content

void-KJx-KQ9xx-AKQ9x


Recommended Posts

X. Sorry but I must be thick; what is the problem? Isn't X obvious?

1.Some experts do not like to double with a void in opponents suit.

2.Some partnerships guarantee 4 card after a double of 2

 

I will X with any partner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

X. Sorry but I must be thick; what is the problem? Isn't X obvious?

1.Some experts do not like to double with a void in opponents suit.

2.Some partnerships guarantee 4 card after a double of 2

 

I will X with any partner.

Can you tell us who these "experts" are, please? Who doesn't X a 2S opening on say a 0454 18 count? I would like to ask these "experts" what they do on such a hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hum.. dbl or 4NT, depending on what I had for dinner :)

Hmm, if 4NT then we might have a tainted meat situation, please be alert. Just kidding of course.

 

I think double is clearly right. Hearts can easily be right if partner has 5. Rigid rules about what to promiss or deny by doubling is ridiculous.

 

However, 4NT is much-much better than 3. When it goes all pass after 3, I'd start throwing up even before the dummy comes down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I might bid 3, though I'm leaning towards 4NT as well. Don't get me wrong, I've made t/o doubles holding a void before but I do it with great discomfort as a calculated risk and pray that partner will pull it.

 

I don't think this is the hand to lie about your holding. When we have one trump less than partner expects, when we can't lead s right away like partner expects, I'd say that on hands that we knock 2 a decent amount, we may have missed a minor suit slam. Or we may end up in game in a 4-3 heart fit going off because of a nasty break.

 

Having said that, I'm no "expert" either. Obviously my opinions are inferior because they don't agree with the 'one true choice' that is double.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thank goodness us nonexperts 3d bidders can have the following weak excuse

1) I bid my longest suit

2) I am void in spades

3) I cannot lead a spade vs x contract

4) I have less than 4 hearts.

5) LTC ..hmm thought that only matters once a fit is found?

C are as long and are better quality, so why don't you bid 3C? You might hear 3D (Yeah, as if!)

So what if you have less than 4H - has congress passed a law disallowing partner to have 5 or more?

I fail to see what LTC has to do with this discussion.

 

The S void is a slight handicap, but a good partner won't pass with less than a decent S holding.

 

Gerben, as a matter of interest, what would you bid with a solid minor a couple of outside stoppers and no S stop if you can't bid 3S with that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dbl

 

The trouble with 3D is that partner is likely to pass with most non-descript 6 counts and we will miss game. Plus the odds are 50-50 that we will be in the wrong minor contract. Plus there is the possibility that partner has 5 and we will miss a good heart contract. Plus there is the possibility that partner has 4 and the moysian 4H contract is our best spot.

 

Name ONE expert that would dbl 2S guaranteeing 4?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I join the majority vote for double.

 

BTW, I doubt the wisdom of debating what call to make without contemplating what may happen next, and I don't just mean what partner will bid.

 

I am sure we have all noticed that the opps are at favourable vulnerability and we have a noticeable lack of s. The odds are good that LHO is about to raise the ante, and (in several ways) we may welcome that. Consider: if LHO doesn't raise s, what does that tell us about partner's hand?

 

 

As it is, I am comfortable with doubling in most scenarios.

 

If LHO bounces, and partner doubles (card-showing), I bid 4 over 3 and 4N over 4.

 

If partner bids some number of s: over 5 I will raise to slam, over 4 I will pass... he sure isn't bidding 5 on a 4 card suit, and maybe I owe him a 5 bid...

 

And so on. If he passes some number of s: I double again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks all for the answers.

I don't remember the actual distribution, but let me try to construct one that resembles it:[hv=d=e&n=saqxxxhxxxxdxxcxx&w=sxxhaqxxdaxxcxxxx&e=skjxxxxhxxdjxxxcx&s=shkjxdkq9xxcakq9x]399|300|Scoring: MP[/hv]

Bidding at our table was:

(2S)-4S-4NT

5C-6H

4S was the ideal bid. It shows a Spade void and 5-5 in the minors (so 3 hearts) and 3 or 4 loosers :o ... that is what I thought.

Most important lesson for me is probably not to fantasise too much about a bid. Partner should have the same fantasies then. He thought I showed 5-5 and as I could have shown the minors with 4NT.

BTW: I didn't take 4NT as ace asking, but as spade values.

(6H was -2, probably partner's hand was a bit better then shown)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...