Jump to content

9-card H


kgr

Recommended Posts

4H. This isn't a splinter bid.

 

It's possible I'll miss a slam (though many of the hands that make slam partner will bid with), but it's more important to preempt the auction immediately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

1H, followed by 4H, ... and we

will play in hearts, unless he bids

7S.

 

It depends on your agreement,

but 4H would be a splinter for me.

 

With kind regards

Marlowe

I bid 4.

 

I presume 3 would be a splinter, so what is the difference in hand type if 4 is a splinter as well?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm torn between 4 and 1. With 4 we might miss slam but I'm not so sure we will be able to do accurate slam investigation if I start with 1 and opps intervene. I think it's more likely that 4 will prevent opps from bidding 4. Then again, I know what to do over 4 (I bid 5).

 

I think I bid 4 because of the doubleton spades and the fact that LHO is an unpassed hand. I "know" that LHO will bid some number of spades over 4.

 

And no, it's not a splinter. You could use 3 as a splinter which would at least allow you to end in 3NT, but even that would be a silly agreement, IMHO. There's plenty of bidding space after a forcing 2 raise, that bid doesn't have to deny a singleton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And no, it's not a splinter. You could use 3 as a splinter which would at least allow you to end in 3NT, but even that would be a silly agreement, IMHO. There's plenty of bidding space after a forcing 2 raise, that bid doesn't have to deny a singleton.

Ouch. Helene, splinter are my friends, please don't attack them. :D I definitely would not want to play 1m-3M as anything but a splinter, I think they are great. (If you have a system to show shortness and extras after 1C-2C, I will concede of course.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And no, it's not a splinter. You could use 3 as a splinter which would at least allow you to end in 3NT, but even that would be a silly agreement, IMHO. There's plenty of bidding space after a forcing 2 raise, that bid doesn't have to deny a singleton.

Ouch. Helene, splinter are my friends, please don't attack them. :D I definitely would not want to play 1m-3M as anything but a splinter, I think they are great. (If you have a system to show shortness and extras after 1C-2C, I will concede of course.)

I think that was her point. You should certainly have some way to show shortness after 1C-2C given all the room you have. 1m-3M as preemptive is very very useful, and you can put the splinters into the inverted raise. But I digress...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And no, it's not a splinter. You could use 3 as a splinter which would at least allow you to end in 3NT, but even that would be a silly agreement, IMHO. There's plenty of bidding space after a forcing 2 raise, that bid doesn't have to deny a singleton.

Ouch. Helene, splinter are my friends, please don't attack them. ;) I definitely would not want to play 1m-3M as anything but a splinter, I think they are great. (If you have a system to show shortness and extras after 1C-2C, I will concede of course.)

I think that was her point. You should certainly have some way to show shortness after 1C-2C given all the room you have. 1m-3M as preemptive is very very useful, and you can put the splinters into the inverted raise. But I digress...

I guess I should have been more specific: I like to be able to show shortness below 3N - I think it is a misunderstanding to think of splinters for minors as only a slam tool, they are quite useful as choice of games (with modest slam interest implied).

So if you and Helene can do that below 3N, we are all happy :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I should have been more specific: I like to be able to show shortness below 3N - I think it is a misunderstanding to think of splinters for minors as only a slam tool, they are quite useful as choice of games (with modest slam interest implied).

So if you and Helene can do that below 3N, we are all happy ;)

So after all we all agree :-) Happy Newyear

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As long as not playing that 4 is a splinter, this looks like a nice hand for a preemptive jump to game. If PD has a control oriented hand he can carry onwards since he has to suspect that I can take lots of tricks with as trump to bid 4 vulnerable.

 

Certainly I am at the top of my 4 bid as far as offence goes, but sometimes the opps are getting to 4 if I slow play the hand.

 

Replying 1 and then jumping to 4 is OK, and might just find a bit more slams, but it also lets the opps in and looking at my hand I have to bid at the 5 level if they bid to a pointed suit game.

 

On some days, the opps have a cold slam here, inspite of PD's opening.

 

Slight pref for 4 rather than 1 for me.

 

.. neilkaz ..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not close for me. 4 then bid one more over any number of spades they bid if partner can't double them.

 

Come to think of it, if we have the understanding that it is preemptive, a direct 5 isn't so bad--it will really put them to the guess plus the information that I'm defenseless but too good offensively to settle for 4 will let partner bid some slams that he will miss over 4. The downside is the possibility of down one (or one more) in the event they would sell to 4 or partner could double 4 successfully.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dealer: ?????
Vul: ????
Scoring: Unknown
AK4
[space]
A542
AK9654
T8765
J5
KJ976
J
QJ92
A8
Q8
QT732
3
KQT976432
T3
8
 

Thanks for answers.

Here the full hand and bidding at our table:

1C-4NT

5C-5H

7C-(DBL)-7H

P-(DBL)

Result: -2 after a club lead.

This is an example of why it is still so that good hands must be progressed slowly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is an example of why it is still so that good hands must be progressed slowly

Hmmm

 

I think its an example why you need to be careful chosing your partners.

 

7 is completely insane. I can ALMOST understand a 6 bid.

 

Presumably opener intended that 5 show 0 or 3 key cards with clubs as trump. Partner's 5 bid denied interest in slam opposite zero key cards. 6 would confirm three keys, and offer a choice of strain. 6 is actually a pretty decent contract. Doesn't make on a club lead, but I've been in worse slams.

 

On the other hand, 7 is just asking for trouble. Your club suit isn't nearly strong enough to play for no losers opposite x or even xx. You certainly don't have any tolerance for partner's heart suit.

 

I agree with comments that 4NT should not be keycard for clubs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>Your partner opens 1C and RHO passes.

>What do you bid?

 

Cheapest forcing bids until at least game has been reached.

Are you seriously suggesting responding 1?

certainly not - but I wondered why no overcall. My initial bid will of course be 1 and then I want to be able to take advantage from interference, basically cue bidding. The outcome looks like I will not be able to buy for 4, which I suspected earlier. Then I need some guidance of what to do in 5 level as I dont believe in 6-level. I assumed distribution to be more unbalanced than it really was.

 

5DBL is the perfect contract. I need to be able to have something for a DBL of a possible 5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...