1eyedjack Posted November 26, 2006 Report Share Posted November 26, 2006 [hv=d=w&v=b&n=sj62hjdkj83cqjt63&w=sq874hakt65dca942&e=sakt5h942da7542c8&s=s93hq873dqt96ck75]399|300|Scoring: IMPCompare and contrast: 6♠ v 6♥ by E/W[/hv]This came up in a TG today, I was West and perpetrated probably one of the least impressive auctions of all time, but the bidding is not the point of the hand. I just thought that the hand was mildly interesting because, while both 6♠ and 6♥ fail on a ♥ lead, 6♠ is also down (but not 6♥) on a ♣ lead - both making on either ♠ on ♦ lead. The play to 6♥ on a non-♥ lead is interesting. It looks to me as though you need to discard ♠ not ♣ on ♦A, and ruff all the low ♣. That seems counter-intuitive. I wonder if there are layouts when that line costs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.