zasanya Posted October 5, 2006 Report Share Posted October 5, 2006 (edited) NORTH ♠108xx,♥QJ10x,♦AQx, ♣Kx, SOUTH ♠KJx, ♥A9x, ♦109x,♣Axxx I was kibbing my favourite expert in a local prestigious tournament.The contract was 3NtThe lead was small ♥, declarer played Q, rho K, declarer won with A.Trick 2 Declarer played ♠J, LHO,Dummy played small, RHO won with QTrick 3 RHO played small, ♣ LHO's 9 was allowed to winTrick 4 LHO returned ♥ Dummy won RHO followedTrick 5 ♠ from dummy RHO followed, Declarers K fell to ATrick 6 ♣ 10 from RHO Dummy won RHO followedTrick 7 ♠10 from dummy, RHO discaded ♦7Trick 8 small ♥ from Dummy, RHO discarded ♦ 2, indicates ♦ honorTrick 9 ♣A, LHO discarded small ♥Trick 10 ♦, small from LHO, Q from dummy, RHO wins KTrick 11-12 RHO cashes 2 ♣DOWN 2Deal was played on 7 other tables.All others (those whom I asked) made 2 OTs.After the same lead they finessed ♦ 10 lost to K won ♣ return and finessed RHO's ♠ Q Do you think my experts play was correct?[ Edited October 5, 2006 by zasanya Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1eyedjack Posted October 5, 2006 Report Share Posted October 5, 2006 I can't see how crossing to dummy in Hearts and then leading low Spade to the Jack can be any worse then the adopted play. I don't think I would test the Diamonds until after I have tested the Spades, though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Codo Posted October 5, 2006 Report Share Posted October 5, 2006 I don´t see any advantage in his line. Why not cross in Heart and play a spade up or try the double finesse in diamond instead? Maybe he simply had a blind spot. This happens to experts. Just less often then it happens to us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.