Jump to content

Aggregate Teams of IV, Board III


Finch

Recommended Posts

[hv=d=s&v=n&n=sakq95h64da64c1053&s=s82haj105dq1052cak6]133|200|Scoring: Total Points

1 P 1 P

1NT P 2 x

xx P 3NT all pass[/hv]

 

2 = forces opener to bid 2, promises at least 5 spades (this is how we raise to 3NT with a 5-card spade suit)

Early on in the match, partner decided not to risk playing 2Hxx in a known 4-2 fit.

 

9 of hearts lead ducked round to your 10.

Plan the play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MY plan is to duck a spade to the 9 next round. Lets say, this looses and rho plays a high heart, ducked again and a low spade to my King.

I then try to run spades till I reach:

x

-

Axx

Tx

 

opps.

-

AJ

QTx

A

 

Maybe the discards will help me to find the winning line. If nothing spectacular happens, I throw the jack of Hearts on the last Spade and I try a diamond to the queen. If this looses

and rho plays a club, I win, take the ace and hope to squeeze him in the minors.

If he retruns a Diamond, I hope he has the jack and let it run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll start by leading a small spade to the 9 at trick 2. If LHO puts 10 or J, ace and a spade back will clear the suit.

 

After surrendering a spade, cash top clubs and check whether spades break. If not, lead a heart back and duck East's honor. Hopefully we'll only have red cards left and I'll guess the diamonds :huh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am a simple soul: after the 10 wins, I have 8 aces and need only one more trick. This can come from literally any suit, altho I wouldn't count on too strongly :(

 

is the logical place to look.. if the suit breaks no worse than 4-2, we simply concede a trick in the suit and claim.

 

The percentage play, by a wide margin, is low to the 9. It loses only to stiff 10 or J and wins against the remaining 4 singletons and the void.

 

If it loses, the analysis is complex... I had written a long answer, but if the are foul, it seems to me that all probable lines require, ultimately, a guess in . There are some situations in which a red suit end game can develope against rho (we duck the return if RHO wins the 1st ), but my guess is that against opps who give nothing away in defence, I will eventually play A and a low.... whether I play the Q or the 10, I cannot and will not say without being at the table.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I'm obviously too clever for my own good. I know what the best line in spades is for 4 tricks, but I was worried about what would happen if I lost a spade trick to a singleton honour in East's hand: as mikeh says I will have to guess diamonds eventually. Whereas if I didn't lose an early spade trick, I have time to lose two diamond tricks and still come to 9 if either the K or J is onside, or they are 3-3. So I wasn't convinced this line was correct in the context of the whole hand.

 

I played the AK of spades at tricks 2 and 3, and of course RHO showed out, discarding a diamond on the second spade which didn't bode well. I continued with a diamond to the 10 and Jack, and won the heart return with the ace. But now I had 9 tricks certain by playing a diamond to the ace:

- if RHO discarded I could cash the AK of clubs and play a diamond to endplay West who was now marked with a 5242, losing 3 diamonds and a spade

- if RHO followed I can cash the SQ and play a third diamond, losing 2 diamonds and either 2 spades or a heart and a club (depending who started with 4 diamonds)

 

If I had lost at trick 3 to a singleton spade honour none of this would have worked.

 

(If East had played a heart honour at trick 1, this wouldn't have worked either as it's another quick loser.)

 

Everyone who played a spade to the 9 was in overtrick mode quite early on. Sigh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frances, I think you are being unfair in your comment that those who played a to the 9 were in overtrick mode.

 

If we assume that East has at least 5, then the odds of being 5-1, either way, are 15.9 %, but the odds of east having 5 are less than 3%.

 

If East has 6 (vanishingly small odds) we find that out when we lead our towards the 9, and now revert to your line.

 

But if West shows in, the only times we have issues are when either W has a stiff small or when E has a stiff honour.

 

On all other holdings, we are COLD on the lead.

 

W having a stiff small is approximately 1.5%

 

E having a stiff honour is approximately(a little less than) 5.5%.

 

So our line of the to the 9 assures the contract approximately 93% of the time, and we add to this the approximately 50% chance that we will be guessing the successfully (when are foul), and we are up to about a 96.5% line.

 

Your line requires a honour onside, of a 3-3 break or a 3-3 break... I am not sure of the odds on all of this, but I would be surprised if they were greater than 96.5%.

 

So the to the 9 was not about overtricks, but about maximizing the odds of bringing in 9 tricks... any overtrick is strictly a bonus... altho if your line were 100%, the imp odds, in a long match, actually suggest the 96.5% play, risking 10 or 12 imps to win 1 makes sense when the odds of winning the overtrick are that high.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't mean a spade to the 9 was played in an attempt to achieve overtricks.

I meant that on the actual layout, a spade to the 9 holds, and you can immediately start thinking about overtricks while at the table I was still trying to make the contract after starting with two top spades...

 

You are wrong about the chances of my line, however, and I do think it's interesting to compare them.

 

Assuming hearts are 5-2 I was definitely making on:

 

Spades 4-2 or better, or singleton spade honour, or 1 diamond honour onside (no guess required), or diamonds 3-3, or diamonds 4-2 with LHO having the length

 

which also looks way over 96.5% to me....

 

The difference between the two lines is that I _think_ that I have actually ensured the contract if East has at least 5 hearts. I'm not certain of this, which is why I posted the hand in the first place.

 

[on the subject of overtricks: it was total points scoring, not IMPs, at which overtricks are even less relevant and it's not clear which line has the best chance of overtricks anyway]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...