Jump to content

4216 over 3D


cherdano

Recommended Posts

I am planning to buy two beers.

 

I know the contract will be 4H. It just will. So, I plan on buying two beers because partner will have pulled it in or partner will not. Celebration or pay back, I am not sure.

 

(I doubled)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I double. If partner bids 3 I will bid 4 which hopefully shows this sort of hand. If, however, he bids 4 I will pass.

 

It could, of course, go badly wrong, but then so could anything else. At least double keeps 3NT in the frame and allows us to find a spade fit if partner happens to have both majors (and is longer in spades OR has enough strength to cue-bid)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I double and bid 4C over 3H, but pass 4H.

 

Last time my partner had this shape we bid

 

3D x P 3H

P 4C P 4S

all pass

 

I think double-then-4C shows this sort of hand (or possibly 3316). I had a very weak 4423 and 4S made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd double and bid 3NT. This should show my hand: no stopper and tollerance for and .

 

Dbl followed by 4 seems also reasonable.

I would NEVER bid 4 as 2-suiter since I'm waaaaay too weak for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last time I saw this pattern, or thereabouts, it was my dummy after I had jumped to 4 on a four-card suit (AKxx). As I held a decent hand with the two missing top heart honors, 4H made. In practice, my approach was to win the lead, cash the top three hearts, and then start winning my clubs.

 

A lot of great stories from great players focus on the 4-2 major fit coming in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd double and bid 3NT. This should show my hand: no stopper and tollerance for and .

 

Dbl followed by 4 seems also reasonable.

I would NEVER bid 4 as 2-suiter since I'm waaaaay too weak for that.

I'd be a bit wary about 'should show my hand: no diamond stopper'

If you had, say,

 

AKx(x)

KQx

Ax

Qxxx(x)

 

wouldn't you like to double then bid 3NT showing roughly take-out double shape and values with a diamond stop, but not certain 3NT is right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand the desire to bid 3NT at once on a take-out double shape.

Let's take my sample hand.

You hold

 

AKx(x)

KQx

Ax

Qxxx(x)

 

and RHO opens 3D

 

You have two alternative calls:

i) double, then bid 3NT over 3M or pass 4M

ii) 3NT

 

I really fail to see the merits of the immediate 3NT call, which both wrongsides the 3NT contract and means that you play 3NT rather than a simple 4M opposite something like xxx Axxxx x KJxx, and 3NT rather than a simple 6M opposite QJxxx Ax xx AJxx.

 

Bidding 3NT at once only gains when partner bids 4M or 4C over the double, and you have 9 tricks in 3NT but don't have game in a suit contract. This is pretty rare, especially when you have such hard diamond values.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After a 3 preempt, I like the double, because my partner will bid 3 Lebensohl-ish on most hands where 3NT is right. 3 jams us.

 

The more I think about it, though, I am leaning back to the double. Sure, "bid 3NT when plausible" is a good rule. But, perhaps the onus should be on partner to bid 3NT when he lacks a major, stopper or no stopper, most of the time...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...