starfruit Posted August 17, 2006 Report Share Posted August 17, 2006 Hi all!Just realised that this section is more suitable for my posts ;) [hv=d=w&v=b&s=s643hdt42caqjt875]133|100|Scoring: IMP[/hv] Dealer passed, and for once partner did not open in you void suit. :lol: He opened 1♠.East come in with 2♥ and it's your bid. On the table I considered 2 possible actions : 1)Bid some number of ♣s. For this I felt like 5♣s seems like a good idea as we play this as preemptive style, denying as much as 2 defensive tricks. With 2 or more we start with 3♣s.But after some reflection this seems like a bad idea as 3NT can easily be our best spot.So probably 3♣s is better? 2)Raise ♠s.How how to raise? How good is my hand in support of ♠s?Our definition of a limit raise is 3 cover tricks... is this correct? And if it is, does it mean that it's ok to cuebid 3♥? The problem is we also define a cue in such situation as "our hand" (is this a wrong idea?) so we might have to double them later if the auction gets too high. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awm Posted August 17, 2006 Report Share Posted August 17, 2006 Ideally you want to show both clubs and spades. If you play fit-showing jumps, perhaps this hand qualifies for a 4♣ call (showing an offensive-oriented raise to 4♠ with a side club suit). Of course ordinarily that's 4♠+5♣ but I think this hand is okay for the bid as well. Not playing fit jumps, it seems reasonable to bid 3♣ followed by spades at the three or four level at next turn. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P_Marlowe Posted August 17, 2006 Report Share Posted August 17, 2006 Hi, depending on the forcing nature of 3C, 3C is certainly ok, altough I prefer a spade raise, 3H, you want to play 4S opposite max. values. With kind regardsMarlowe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenrexford Posted August 18, 2006 Report Share Posted August 18, 2006 2♣ is my vote. I have no idea where this should end up, and I do not want to stress my spade support unless developments suggest that I should. So, I start slowly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twcho Posted August 18, 2006 Report Share Posted August 18, 2006 2♣ is out as opp has already overcalled 2♥. My choice is 3♣ and then support ♠ if given the chance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hrothgar Posted August 18, 2006 Report Share Posted August 18, 2006 You're a passed hand... 3♣ should imply spade support Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walddk Posted August 18, 2006 Report Share Posted August 18, 2006 You're a passed hand... 3♣ should imply spade support I am not a passed hand, LHO opened, so 3♣ doesn't show spade support. I would bid 3♣ anyway, followed by spades as cheaply as possible. Roland Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pclayton Posted August 18, 2006 Report Share Posted August 18, 2006 I don't like fit jumps with a 4 card difference in the suits. With AQJ-6th I might try it though, but I'd really like a spade honor with only 3 trump. I had a similar hand about 5 years ago. Pard opened 2♠ weak and RHO doubled. I tried 4♣ and competed to 5♣ which seemed a good description. The difference is we had a known 9 card fit. They competed to 5♥ which we nipped a trick. I don't mind supporting the major with a side 7 bagger, but I've had a few cases with a side 8 bagger and 3 card support. The 8 bagger invariably plays better and suit quality doesn't seem to be a huge issue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeartA Posted August 18, 2006 Report Share Posted August 18, 2006 I would bid 3C as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Posted August 18, 2006 Report Share Posted August 18, 2006 It's hard to choose between 3♣ and 4♣ (fit jump). For a fit jump you probably need better ♠s, so I'll go with 3♣. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted August 18, 2006 Report Share Posted August 18, 2006 4♣ if it's a fit-bid.3♣+4♠ otherwise. Can't get picky with points on hands like these. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenrexford Posted August 18, 2006 Report Share Posted August 18, 2006 I'm bidding 2♣ anyway. LOL OK -- I'm with the THREEEEE CLubs people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Posted August 18, 2006 Report Share Posted August 18, 2006 You can always try to bid 2♣, if opps accept it, you're doing great :( Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neilkaz Posted August 18, 2006 Report Share Posted August 18, 2006 I support PD ny bidding what I expect we can make and that is a direct 4♠. Since I didn't bid 3♥ first or make some forcing call like the natural 3♣, PD should know that I don't have too much defence. I probably have to bid 4♠ anyhow if the opps compete in ♥ as expected and prefer playing in a known fit, rather than speculating on 5♣ being better. .. neilkaz .. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenrexford Posted August 18, 2006 Report Share Posted August 18, 2006 The problem with just raising spades is that I hate this hand for spade play. I expect a trump lead. On bad days, I may contribute only two tricks, with a finesse in diamonds failing. In contrast, in clubs, I may well give up the diamond finesse and the club King and still make game on my junk. I can see some argument for a simple 2♠, probably not the end contract, and later club fanaticism. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bid_em_up Posted August 18, 2006 Report Share Posted August 18, 2006 If I had a 4th trump, I would be willing to bid 3C and then raise to at least 4♠ later. Since I dont, and although my hand has reasonable values, it is not strong enough to force to game. I do have a fit with partner, however, and am a believer in the philosophy that weak(ish) hands should show a fit for opener as quickly as possible, so a mundane 2♠ it is for me. I will bid 4♣ or 4♠ over any further call partner may make, but the odds are....if it gets passed out in 2♠, this is where we belong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starfruit Posted August 19, 2006 Author Report Share Posted August 19, 2006 Here comes the full hand~ [hv=d=w&v=b&n=sqt9872hk43dkqj7c&w=sa5hqt862da653c62&e=skjhaj975d98ck943&s=s643hdt42caqjt875]399|300|Scoring: IMP[/hv] On table i tried 5♣ and LHO doubled with his strength of 2 Aces.5♣X went -2 while the other table, without interference, got to the good 4♠ game and made it easily after a ♦ lead and ducked. 15 IMPs. Ouch :o Defense only got its ♦A and ♠A and a ♦ ruff with the ♠K. Now upon reflection, I think I support bidding 3♣ and supporting ♠ at the next convenient level.Sure it'll be expecting too much for partner to cover 5 out my 7 losers. :lol: Nobody here's looking for a 3NT with that juicy looking ♣AQJTxxx? :rolleyes: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pclayton Posted August 19, 2006 Report Share Posted August 19, 2006 Here comes the full hand~ [hv=d=w&v=b&n=sqt9872hk43dkqj7c&w=sa5hqt862da653c62&e=skjhaj975d98ck943&s=s643hdt42caqjt875]399|300|Scoring: IMP[/hv] On table i tried 5♣ and LHO doubled with his strength of 2 Aces.5♣X went -2 while the other table, without interference, got to the good 4♠ game and made it easily after a ♦ lead and ducked. 15 IMPs. Ouch :o Defense only got its ♦A and ♠A and a ♦ ruff with the ♠K. Now upon reflection, I think I support bidding 3♣ and supporting ♠ at the next convenient level.Sure it'll be expecting too much for partner to cover 5 out my 7 losers. :lol: Nobody here's looking for a 3NT with that juicy looking ♣AQJTxxx? :rolleyes: If I chose 3♣ as a WJS (is that what the others are suggesting?), I think thats where the hand plays. On the actual layout if I raise spades, pard just shoots out the game with the 5 loser hand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starfruit Posted August 21, 2006 Author Report Share Posted August 21, 2006 The auction has gone 1♠ - (2♥) so WJS isn't available. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.