kenberg Posted August 6, 2006 Report Share Posted August 6, 2006 This seems to have drifted off of the original post of 1C-1D in SAYC (which does not, by default, use Walsh reponses). But probably there isn't that much more to be said about the original question. As to describing a bid by "Walsh" or whatever, no doubt it's not the approved way. Nevertheless, here is a ecent experience:2D on my right, alert on my left, query by me. Four spades, five hearts, 11-15 hcps. I'm thinking "Oh no. Another of these new gadgets". Then "Oops. Flannery. Why didn't they just say so". I actually like reponses such as "Walsh", "Flannery" etc. It seems to me that if your opponents are playing a 2/1 card with lots of gadgetry and describe themselves as advanced players, they are likely to be fine with "Walsh". But I accept the fact that it does not have the blessing of the authorities and I at least try to comply. On a recent hand I described our leads as 3/5. Of course I explained when I was asked what that meant, but my initial description (which I sent at trick 1 to the opps before I led third best in a side suit) was just 3/5. Wrong? I'm not that great a typist and we do need to get through the hands. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.