extrasolid Posted July 10, 2006 Report Share Posted July 10, 2006 Hello, a. In our partnership (modified polish club) I suggested to play (like Bocchi-Duboin-Club 2001) transferbids on the 1♣ opening. 1♣-1♦ =4+♥s, 7+HCP1♣-1♥=4+♠s, 7+HCP1♣-1♠ = 0-6 without 4cM, 0-11 otherwise, 12-16 bal. (like 1♦ before) This occupies the first-level responses. On the other side, 1♠ has to be forcing, so with 11-14 you have to bid 1NT and play a weak one. P has given a lot of information too, so it can get dangerous, mainly vulnerable. Any experiences playing something like that? b. As alternative I suggested to remove 12-16 bal. from the possibilities as responder. Then 1♠ is NF - you only can miss close games with fitting hands in the minors - and you can pass with e. g. 11-14 bal. and 4♠s. Any experiences playing something like that? If you agree to a) I suggested further to play raises as before, 1♥/♠ as transferbid shows 11-14 bal. with 3cardsupport (again stolen from Bocchi-Duboin :P ). The other opportunity is to play the transfer with 4 card support and raise only if you are stronger than 11-14; of course after new evaluating your hand after finding the fit. Any hints for me? Uli Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerben42 Posted July 15, 2006 Report Share Posted July 15, 2006 I don't think this is a good structure. If you want to have opener as declarer I suggest 1♥ = 7+, 4+♠1♠ = 7+, 4+♥ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerben42 Posted July 22, 2006 Report Share Posted July 22, 2006 Since no one responds here is why: After 1♣ - 1♠ (possibly negative) when both players are weak, you are in BIG trouble!Also since the 1♠ bid has many possibilities you are preempting yourself... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.