Jump to content

The decimal places in IMP results


Miron

Recommended Posts

A short example, three tables.

 

  1 3 HX   W SA  Player1   6     800     13.00         

  2 3D     N  H6  Player2   12     170     -2.50         

  3 3N     N  H3  Player3   8     -100    -10.50 

 

Player1, +800, Player 2 +170 = player1 up 630 or +12 imps, player 2 is -12.00 imps

 

Player1 +800. Player3 -100 = player1 up 900 or +14 imps, player3 = -14 imps

 

Player2 +170, player3 -100 = player2 up 270 or 7 imps, player 1 minus 7 imps.

 

Player 1 +12 +14 = 26

Player2 -12 + 7 = -5 = -5/2 = -2.5

Player3 -14 -7 = =21 = -21/2 = -10.5

 

Notice divide by the number of hands each partnership played to get average imp score.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are getting the order of what happens (averaging and imping) the wrong way round.

 

The program calculates your imp result against every other table's result who has played that board. If the board has been played 6 times, you will have five imp results - think of it as scoring with five different team-mates sitting the other way. That gives you a total imp result (called the 'cross-imp') which can be quite a big number. To make the number easier to understand, and to allow like-for-like comparisons when there are different numbers of tables involved, this total imp number is divided by the number of comparisons to give you an average cross-imp for the board.

 

To take a simple example, suppose you score +620, one other pair score +620 and everyone else has made +170 on your cards. If the board has been played 10 times you will score +10 imps 8 times and 0 imps once, averaging +80/9 or +8.9 imps times as you have 9 comparisons. If the board has been played 20 times you will score +10 imps 18 times and 0 imps once, averaging +9.5 imps.

 

There is an alternative method of scoring called 'Butler' imps which is close to what you describe: in that form of scoring your result is compared to the average of all the other results and that difference imp'd (sometimes not all the other results are used). In practice both methods get very similar answers over a big enough set of boards, but cross-imps are generally preferred now (Butler imps were easier to calculate in the days before computers did our scoring for us).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for explaining!

 

Now i understand it. BBO uses cross-imps divided with number of tables the board is played. (Hope this is true :lol: )

If I understood Fred correctly, it is cross-imps divided by number of comparisons, number of comparisons is 1 less than the number of tables.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for explaining!

 

Now i understand it. BBO uses cross-imps divided with number of tables the board is played. (Hope this is true :lol: )

As trumpace points out, the calculation is divided by the number of comparisons. Note for the three replay example I gave, the division was by two.. That is, you add up all your imps you earned compared one at a time, then divide by the number of comparisions you did to get your average result.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...