lalislol Posted June 19, 2006 Report Share Posted June 19, 2006 :rolleyes: Well, alright...Verona has not been a hugh success for the VG audience. How the country which fathered the likes of Da Vinci, Tesla and Fermi (not to mention 'our' Amerigo) cannot handle a seemingly simple internet connection is beyond me, but...c'est la vie as they say in Greece (I think). Unfortunately, Roland takes these glitches to heart as if he were to blame. (Indeed, I believe two of the Walldk's were sulking, not to be seen. :P ) But such is one of the trials and tribulations of even a top-notch organizer, which Roland certainly is, and does not lead to demerits. We all really appreciate your continued efforts to bring us the best in bridge entertainment, Roland. Better luck (or better technicals in Italy) for the rest of the tournament. In any event, I shall not try to get a refund on my money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hrothgar Posted June 20, 2006 Report Share Posted June 20, 2006 I'd imagine that the Italian Federation is somewhat peeved...I seem to recall that they were planning comprehensive coverage of the Italian teams. Any idea whats causing all the technical glitches? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walddk Posted June 20, 2006 Report Share Posted June 20, 2006 Unfortunately, Roland takes these glitches to heart as if he were to blame. To be honest with you, I do not. I am pretty relaxed about it all although I am as disappointed as all the other thousands of spectators. If I had been at the venue, I would not have been responsible, and even less so now that I am 3,292 km away from Verona. I am pretty experienced regarding organisation and co-ordination, but when it comes to technical issues, I give up. In this regard, I am absolutely clueless. I don't even know what causes the glitches, and even if I did there is nothing I could do about it. Sometimes I must hide (all Walddk accounts invisible) in order not to get 100 private messages a minute, but let me stress that almost all messages are very sympathetic, because our members know that it's beyond BBO's control. I am certainly not in a position to blame the organisers for something I can't judge from afar, but allow me to quote one of the more amusing private chat messages I got yesterday: "Next time, perhaps choose Zambia, or some other high tech country" ;) Roland Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DenisO Posted June 20, 2006 Report Share Posted June 20, 2006 I am certainly not in a position to blame the organisers for something I can't judge from afar, I'm a believer in the "the buck stops here" so I reckon the WBF and FIGB are the culprits. There seems to be a surprising lack of awareness/planning of the requirements for a successful broadcast of these major events to the worldwide internet audience. But perhaps not surprising from an organisation that doesn't even give the hand records for the two major events i.e. Rosenblum and McConnell cup on the official website. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walddk Posted June 20, 2006 Report Share Posted June 20, 2006 But perhaps not surprising from an organisation that doesn't even give the hand records for the two major events i.e. Rosenblum and McConnell cup on the official website. Then add the non-existent "Participants". Not sure why they advertise this feature when it remains empty on day 11 of the championships. "The names of the participants will be posted here as they become available", it reads. When is that I wonder. I have said it before, and I am saying it again: the WBF, and the EBL for that matter, must employ a full-time co-ordinator. The open championships are money machines (look at the entry fees and number of participants in the bulletins), so one would assume that the budget should allow for this. The link to the outside world is *very* important. That goes for the official web site as well as live vugraph presentations. I don't know if it's possible to convince the organisers that it is. Finally, it's the policy of BBO that organisers should pay vugraph operators for their events. It is in *their* interest that *their* tournaments are broadcast to the world. As it is now, BBO must rely on volunteers and we can't always get enough. That's the reason why we had to go for only 1 table at some point earlier in the event, and that may also happen today (Tuesday) because Hervé Lustman is the only one we have for certain. We don't think it's unreasonable that organisers all over the world pay for operators when we offer our software for free. Roland Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finch Posted June 20, 2006 Report Share Posted June 20, 2006 (look at the entry fees and number of participants in the bulletins) That's certainly true.The entry fees were high enough that they made us think twice about playing, and we are hardly badly off as worldwide bridge players go, nor did we have very far to travel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uday Posted June 20, 2006 Report Share Posted June 20, 2006 In ACBL-land card fees are about 15 USD per session (so 30 USD per day in a pair game). Maybe I am misremembering and the fees are slightly higher. What are fees like in the big WBF events? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inquiry Posted June 20, 2006 Report Share Posted June 20, 2006 In ACBL-land card fees are about 15 USD per session (so 30 USD per day in a pair game). Maybe I am misremembering and the fees are slightly higher. What are fees like in the big WBF events? I am not certain if this is dollars (they do have the dollar sign there), but this webpage gives the entry fees... http://www.worldbridge.org/tourn/Verona.06/Information.htm Mixed pairs was 375, Open pairs, qualifying 625 and if you should make the finals, another 250 Senior Pairs 500 Rosenblum Cup 1,250 Etc, you could get a 20% discount on all these for booking though a specific travel agency the webpage above says. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uday Posted June 20, 2006 Report Share Posted June 20, 2006 So feels like about twice as much as acbl events for the mixed pairs (375 for 3 days in the mixed pairs, or 125/day or 62.5 per day per player or 31.25 per session per player. ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kfgauss Posted June 20, 2006 Report Share Posted June 20, 2006 So feels like about twice as much as acbl events for the mixed pairs (375 for 3 days in the mixed pairs, or 125/day or 62.5 per day per player or 31.25 per session per player. ) Yes, but you've essentially prepaid for the final it seems, so it's twice that if you don't qualify. Andy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike777 Posted June 20, 2006 Report Share Posted June 20, 2006 I note in the bulletins they seem to have problems collecting the fees/dues. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walddk Posted June 20, 2006 Report Share Posted June 20, 2006 I note in the bulletins they seem to have problems collecting the fees/dues. From some NCBO's yes. I believe that all participants have paid what they are supposed to in order to enter the various competitions. Roland Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finch Posted June 21, 2006 Report Share Posted June 21, 2006 Yes, in general you couldn't play unless you had paid. There was a consolation final for the mixed pairs with one fewer session, and the other events also have consolation events of one form or another. In Tenerife our NCBO was supposed to be paying our entry fee for us, and that caused all sorts of problems. The 'discount' for booking through the travel agency existed, but we booked our hotel directly rather than through the official agency, it was considerably cheaper that way even including the potential discount off the entry fee. p.s. yes, the amounts are quoted in dollars Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JanM Posted June 25, 2006 Report Share Posted June 25, 2006 So feels like about twice as much as acbl events for the mixed pairs (375 for 3 days in the mixed pairs, or 125/day or 62.5 per day per player or 31.25 per session per player. ) Yes, but you've essentially prepaid for the final it seems, so it's twice that if you don't qualify.Although that was true for the Mixed Pairs, and also for the Rosenblum and McConnell (no entry fees after the initial one), it was not true for the Open and Women's Pairs. Those who entered the Qualifying stage of those events paid the same (250 Euros per player) whether they qualified for the semi-finals or not, but then the semi-final qualifiers had to pay an additional 100 Euros per player for the finals. HOWEVER, the really expensive entry fee was for those players who could "drop in" to the finals because they reached the Round of 8 in the Rosenblum or semi-finals in the McConnell. Those players had to pay the entire 350 Euro entry fee for the finals! I suspect that the Women's Pairs entry fee per session was the highest of any anywhere. The Women's Pairs had a 4 session final, so each of the players who dropped into that stage paid 87.5 Euros per session of play! I understand that these were the players who got to play longer in the Rosenblum and McConnell, and thus their per session entry fees for those events were lower than players who lsot earlier, but this still seems like a *very* high entry fee. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DenisO Posted June 27, 2006 Report Share Posted June 27, 2006 But perhaps not surprising from an organisation that doesn't even give the hand records for the two major events i.e. Rosenblum and McConnell cup on the official website.I did them an injustice - the hand records for Teams and Pairs are now available in pdf format (with makeable contracts, presumably from DealmasterPro) - well done :( Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lalislol Posted July 17, 2006 Author Report Share Posted July 17, 2006 ;)A procedural question: Now that this topic is of no further interest, how does one eliminate it from the Forum? Is the initiator/instigator empowered to do so? Found it easy to start this, but as difficult to stop as a runaway horse. ;) Or do we just keep the 'clutter' forever anon? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finch Posted July 17, 2006 Report Share Posted July 17, 2006 If you stop posting to it, it will gradually work its way down the list of active topics and into history. Unless every week or so, someone posts a new comment.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lalislol Posted July 17, 2006 Author Report Share Posted July 17, 2006 ;) Thanks, Frances. Have admonished my keyboard for today's post, and have its promise to stop. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.