Jump to content

Five Hearts Redoubled Tick


jchiu

How do you assess the result for N/S?  

25 members have voted

  1. 1. How do you assess the result for N/S?

    • Unlucky
      0
    • Poor Bidding by (mostly) North
      23
    • Poor Bidding by (mostly) South
      2
    • Poor Bidding by both N/S
      0


Recommended Posts

[hv=d=s&v=n&n=skq543h---dq62cj7652&w=sajh9872d1074cq1094&e=s6hakqj1043dak93c8&s=s109872h65dj85cak3]399|300|Scoring: IMP[/hv]

 

Auction proceeds ...

 

Pass Pass Pass 1

Pass 2 2 4

4 5 Dbl Rdbl

 

where 4 is a splinter and E/W were not playing constructive or Bergen raises by a passed hand. Blame someone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everything was dandy until the double. Did north know he had a single trick!??! He is lucky that dummy didn't hit with a doubleton diamond. After the redouble he should have wised up and just taken his lumps in 5X.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 1 overcall is far from being acceptable, but North is the culprit no matter what.

 

1. He should have bid 4 over 2.

2. Double of 5 is ¤¤#!!

 

He doesn't have a single defensive trick.

 

Roland

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, this was a trick question. Someone is starting to figure me out, so I will admit that North was none other than the illustrious GiB. I am not sure whether I could find a human who would make that double. Had I let this secret out of the bag, I surely would have received more than two votes to blame me instead.

 

However, I was playing two-cent rubber bridge, and after looking at the robot's idiocy, finally came to the conclusion that GiB doubles on supposed points, rather than tricks. It does not do the simulation that it is so famous for, but rather relies on me (with a hand that passed directly over 1) to have 12 points for my 4 call. I believe that this is a consistent bug in GiB, and almost pulled to 5 myself due to lack of trust, something that I would never do with a human partner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, this was a trick question. Someone is starting to figure me out, so I will admit that North was none other than the illustrious GiB. I am not sure whether I could find a human who would make that double. Had I let this secret out of the bag, I surely would have received more than two votes to blame me instead.

 

However, I was playing two-cent rubber bridge, and after looking at the robot's idiocy, finally came to the conclusion that GiB doubles on supposed points, rather than tricks. It does not do the simulation that it is so famous for, but rather relies on me (with a hand that passed directly over 1) to have 12 points for my 4 call. I believe that this is a consistent bug in GiB, and almost pulled to 5 myself due to lack of trust, something that I would never do with a human partner.

Ouch, that's many cents!

 

I am not sure this is the kind of example Fred is looking for wrt fixing GIB's bidding, but you can try.

 

Arend

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...