Jump to content

Improving GIB's bidding


fred

Recommended Posts

We are making an effort to improve GIB's performance, especially in the bidding.

 

The GIB program comes with a database that includes information that describes the meanings of many bidding sequences. This is a very big and complex file and, not surprisingly, it contains some errors. Some of these errors manifest themselves in unexplainably strange bids by GIB.

 

The easiest way for us to track down and fix these errors is by looking at example hands in which GIB made a crazy bid. For example:

 

- GIB has been known to respond with a Jacoby transfer to partner's 1NT opening and then Pass the completion of the transfer with a very strong hand.

 

- GIB sometimes interprets the cuebid of the opponents suit as a natural bid.

 

- GIB sometimes runs from a redoubled contract to the same suit at the next level.

 

If you see things like this happen it would be very helpful if you could send me a copy of your BBO log file from the session in question as an e-mail attachment. Please include in your e-mail a note of the board number (or numbers) in which the strange bid (or bids) occurred.

 

If you can't figure out how to do this, it is OK to type up the hand and include that in the e-mail. I will need to know the dealer, vulnerabilty, the bidding up to the point of the problem, and the 13 cards that the GIB that made the strange bid was dealt. I don't need to know the contents of the other 3 hands (but feel free to send this information if you are so inclined).

 

My e-mail address is: fred@bridgebase.com

 

Please note that we are looking for examples of bids made by GIB that make absolutely no sense. We are not concerned with reasonable bids that GIB made that worked out badly on the actual deal. Examples from MB and MBTs are especially useful, but examples from play against GIB in the Main Bridge Club could be helpful as well.

 

I am going to be away from my office between this Friday and roughly June 25 so and I may not be able to respond to e-mail during this time.

 

Thanks in advance for anyone who is willing to send us examples of strange bids by GIB. Hopefully with your help will be able to make some positive improvements to GIB and this should lead to a better BBO experience for a lot of our members.

 

Fred Gitelman

Bridge Base Inc.

www.bridgebase.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi, Fred

 

A word of caution here: back when Matt Ginsberg was active in

GIB development there was a mailing list with a few very keen

participants (some of them are BBO members) and as you

would expect there was a flood of allegedly strange GIB calls.

Matt had devoted a lot of time and energy to these strange

bids but, as far as I remember, there was no discernible

progress in most cases. There is always the danger that when

you fix something here, you unfix something else elsewhere.

I am no expert in the matter, but it seems to me that when

the sample of deals is very small then GIB is more likely to

do something weird.

 

There are also some "patented" idiosyncracies of GIB, like

transferring into a four-card suit that seem to work not bad.

 

On the other hand, the single most frustrating habit of GIB

is imho to think that pard holds the world when pard is

protecting, in auctions like

 

1H-pass-4H-?

When you bid now 4S with QJxxxx and an opening bid, GIB

will think you have a GF hand and propel you to slam.

 

Anyway, good luck

 

Nikos

Link to comment
Share on other sites

- GIB has been known to respond with a Jacoby transfer to partner's 1NT opening and then Pass the completion of the transfer with a very strong hand.

an example

http://online.bridgebase.com/myhands/hands...rname=oscarkwok

 

& interesting to found

some GIB bid 1NT->6NT

some GIB bid 1NT->2D(transfer)->2H-> pass (obviously a wrong bid)!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just wondering...has anyone see GIB transfer to spades and then pass with a big hand? This example plus 2 others I have seen have been transfers to hearts with big hands.

 

Can we call this the Major Big GIB Bug?

 

Any chance to use GIB with set hands to check this?

 

fritz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We know about the "Major Big Gib Bug"; we are testing a fix, and if the fix is not worse than the problem we'll probably roll it into production sometime late tonight.

 

The way the fix process goes is: we identify an issue, someone figures out which gib rules need tweaking and tweaks them, then we test to make sure nothing unrelated broke, then we roll it into production.

 

The first such gib tweak went in the other day, when we instructed the mbt gibs to not rely solely on the rules for bidding but to exercise judgement as well.

 

The second will be this "Major Bid GIB Bug" fix.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi, Fred

 

A word of caution here: back when Matt Ginsberg was active in

GIB development there was a mailing list with a few very keen

participants (some of them are BBO members) and as you

would expect there was a flood of allegedly strange GIB calls.

Matt had devoted a lot of time and energy to these strange

bids but, as far as I remember, there was no discernible

progress in most cases. There is always the danger that when

you fix something here, you unfix something else elsewhere.

I am no expert in the matter, but it seems to me that when

the sample of deals is very small then GIB is more likely to

do something weird.

 

There are also some "patented" idiosyncracies of GIB, like

transferring into a four-card suit that seem to work not bad.

 

On the other hand, the single most frustrating habit of GIB

is imho to think that pard holds the world when pard is

protecting, in auctions like

 

1H-pass-4H-?

When you bid now 4S with QJxxxx and an opening bid, GIB

will think you have a GF hand and propel you to slam.

 

Anyway, good luck

 

Nikos

Thanks for your concern, Nikos, but the person we are working with was recommended by Matt as the one and only person in the world (besides Matt himself) who is really capable of making a difference.

 

Early indications are that Matt's confidence in this person is well-founded.

 

GIB (like the rest of us) will always make dumb bids from time to time, but I am hopeful that our members will see start to see noticable improvements almost immediately. However, this is a long term project so please be patient if it takes a while for us to address any particular area where there are currently problems.

 

Fred Gitelman

Bridge Base Inc.

www.bridgebase.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...