pclayton Posted May 5, 2006 Report Share Posted May 5, 2006 You are playing Precision with your ex-pard and look at (red on red): ♠void ♥KQT8xx ♦xx ♣K6xxx Pard opens 1♠ and you try 1N (agree? by the way, we don't play 2/1 as GF). Pard tries 2♣ which promises 2+. Now what? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inquiry Posted May 5, 2006 Report Share Posted May 5, 2006 Hard to believe 3♥ is undiscussed..but simple things first. Do I agree with 1NT over 1♠? The answer is no. Being vulnerable I am taking the high road and bidding 2♥ with this hand. This is a very good hand. Having bid 1NT, I am not bidding 2♥, too huge an underbid. I am not passing, as I have game ambition, not 3♣ as that will not get the job done, so I guess here I have to bid 3♥. Better, to start 2♥ imho. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luke warm Posted May 5, 2006 Report Share Posted May 5, 2006 2♥ for me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted May 6, 2006 Report Share Posted May 6, 2006 Since this is precision, the chances of a game are more remote, so I don't feel the need to bid 2♥ over 1♠. Thus 1NT seems fair. Now I'll bid 4♣. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1eyedjack Posted May 7, 2006 Report Share Posted May 7, 2006 Having a bit of trouble with the system here. If 2/1 is NOT GF, on what hands may opener rebid 2C on as few as doubleton, and what is the rationale? That said, I think that there is no possible meaning for 3H other than a big H-C 2-suiter in context. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickf Posted May 7, 2006 Report Share Posted May 7, 2006 I think opposite a limited opening, 3C is enough. You are playing Precision with your ex-pard.However, I'm curious though - did this person become your ex-partner before or after this match? nickfsydney Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pclayton Posted May 7, 2006 Author Report Share Posted May 7, 2006 We stopped playing about 2 years ago. It wasn't my intention to play with him on this team, but one of the members wouldn't make himself available, so we had to juggle the partnerships a little. I bid 2♥ as well and pard passed with: ♠AQ9xx ♥Jx ♦KT9 ♣Axx. At the time, I thought he should have opened a 14-16 1N. At the other table, his hand (John Swanson) opened 1N playing a 15-17 NT! David Weiss Texas'd with mine. Chris can beat the game with a trump lead and a diamond through, but led the ♣Q. I think game is excellent from his side, but only fair from mine. I'm not sure what my LHO will lead against 4♥, but against 2 I got the ♣10 so I made an easy 10 tricks. I think in our old system notes we had 3♥ defined as a splinter for clubs, so I didn't want to risk it. I'm not sure he's going to game anyway, although the scoring dictates he should. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.