Poky Posted April 27, 2006 Report Share Posted April 27, 2006 IMP. They vul. Suppose you play 1♦ as unbalanced so 12-14 balanced hands are opened with 1♣. 1♣ 1♠ Dbl! 2♠pa pa Dbl* pa?? 3♠ Dbl* pa?? ♠Jx♥A7x♦A7xx♣KJ8x ! 4+♥ (no 11 HCP if 5+♥)* Negative What do you bid after the 2nd double?What do you bid after the 3rd double, and why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jlall Posted April 27, 2006 Report Share Posted April 27, 2006 2nd X is value showing and takeout oriented. 2N over that is natural and shows a stopper. X of 3S would be penalty if you've bid 2N. Partner will likely have some balanced hand that isn't guaranteed to make 3N but can beat 3S X a couple and is taking the cash. If you had not bid 2N and bid like 3C, his X would be card showing, but with the expectation that you will pass with a balanced hand (again probably based on a balanced hand himself). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted April 27, 2006 Report Share Posted April 27, 2006 Agree with all Justin's answers. On the actual hand, 3♦ over the second double, pass over the third. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jlall Posted April 27, 2006 Report Share Posted April 27, 2006 On the actual hand open 1D!!! There are hands I will open 1C with 4-4 in the minors (sorry mikeh), but a hand with a stopperless major is not a good one. It will get you into all sorts of troubles when they overcall the suit and partner makes a negative X, as here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeh Posted April 27, 2006 Report Share Posted April 27, 2006 On the actual hand open 1D!!! There are hands I will open 1C with 4-4 in the minors (sorry mikeh), You are still young.... so I forgive you :P Actually, despite my near-rabid stance on the issue, I can understand 1♣ on some 4-4 minor hands... especially if 3rd or 4th chair where the likelihood of going to a minor suit game or any slam is immaterial and we can handle all forseeable auctions: then we may well be better off opening 1♣ on AKxx than 1♦ on Jxxx.... see, I am not totally irrational B) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Codo Posted April 28, 2006 Report Share Posted April 28, 2006 youa re not allow to open 1 ♦, because this had shown another hand, 1 Club was the only opening for 12-14 balanced.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finch Posted April 28, 2006 Report Share Posted April 28, 2006 I would play 2NT as "non-forcing scrambling" over the double of 2S, so I would bid that. Partner can pass with a stop if he wants. Whatever I bid the second time, partner's double of 3S is penalties. No, he can't have a trump stack but it's a pretty firm indication that that's where we should play. I would only consider pulling on a wildly distributional but weak hand . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jlall Posted April 28, 2006 Report Share Posted April 28, 2006 youa re not allow to open 1 ♦, because this had shown another hand, 1 Club was the only opening for 12-14 balanced.. missed that sorry! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pclayton Posted April 28, 2006 Report Share Posted April 28, 2006 Good, bad or indifferent, I play 2N as scrambling in response to a double of a 2 bid in the dead seat. I don't play a 5542 system so I have no idea if this is best, or if I should actually show my "clubs" at this point. If anything, a scrambling 2N would be nice with this, since my minor suit holdings haven't been clarified. Playing standard, I'd bid 3♦. Scrambling would invite a 5-3 club fit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moysian Posted May 7, 2006 Report Share Posted May 7, 2006 Call me stupid, but I see no need to "scramble" with 2n - I have a perfect bid at 3d, and am content to let partner bid his own 3n. If I was 2-3-3-5, I would have tried 3h (partner should know I don't have 4). After the first double, partner must have good stuff, but I don't know if it's based on values, shape, or both. After the 3s bid (and subsequent double), I am more apt to go for the penalty (Partner has values & opps are vul). 3N is clearly wrong, and if partner was truly fired up to play game or slam in the minors - he needed to do something else besides double. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.