Jump to content

Handling Muiderberg - part 2


Free

Recommended Posts

You hold:

[hv=d=e&v=n&s=saxhaq987dxcaj9xx]133|100|Scoring: MP[/hv]

 

And the bidding starts:

2! - 3 - pass - 3NT

pass - ???

2 shows 6-10hcp with exactly 5 and 4+m

 

Remark: you play leaping michaels with 4 or less losers, so this hand didn't really qualify for an immediate 4 bid (showing 55+-). 3 would be asking for a stopper.

 

- Do you agree with 3?

- What do you bid now?

- What do you expect from partner's 3NT?

 

Note: it's MP. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

- Yes, I agree with 3H

- I pass 3NT

 

I might be persuaded 4C is right at IMPs, but I'd probably still pass. I may be biased by knowing the other hand!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with 3H, and I'll pass 3NT.

Since I don't see a fit, i expect you to hold 2 stopper, since my aces prove that you need to exit at least once. Without A you need at least 3 card for that. So there are 7+ minor cards left in your hand. We might well have a fit, but this is a source of tricks in NT too. With 2-3, 4-5, 1 (odds are KJ is offside) and your stopper, I see 8-10 tricks comming up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's what happened:

 

[hv=d=w&v=n&n=saxhaq987dxcaj9xx&w=sqjxxxhtxdqtxxcqx&e=stxhjxxdakxxxxcxx&s=sk8xxhkxxdjxcktxx]399|300|Scoring: MP[/hv]

2 - 3 - pass - 3NT

pass - pass - pass

 

LHO leads small to the K, small back to J, Q and away. Now LHO starts to think that I have a stopper, so he switches to T! I take in dummy, let 7 run, some more , and 2 for 3NT+2. We can't compare with other scores since it was at the beginning, but 6 is laydown! So everyone in 4+2 probably scored better. But apparently not many of the forum would reach 4 anyway.

 

My reasoning for 3NT was that partner probably has a good 6 card with doubleton . In a contract, it will start through my K, and a ruff, and partner will have to make the rest! 3NT would probably work out better if partner has a stop, but no way to ask that... With the North hand however, I thought 4 after the 3NT bid would be the majority's choice, but I was wrong there apparently :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...