New systems continued from "Non-Natrual System"

[civill]

***************************************************************

New Strong Club Bidding(EBS,Eclectic Blue System):-developing

Basis of Eclectic Constructed Open-bidding:

(You could exchange 1C and 1D,if you prefer strong diamond system)

 

Pass

under 12hcps,and beyond belows;

1C

17~22HCPs,with club suit,or balanced or bizarre shape;

1D

10/12~19HCPs,with 4 card or above Diamond suit;

or 12~16HCPs with Clubs suit;

*17~19hcps with poor positions of Honor Cards

1H

10/12~19HCPs,with 5 card or above Heart suit;

*17~19hcps with poor positions of Honor Cards

1S

10/12~19HCPs,with 5 card or above Spade suit;

*17~19hcps with poor positions of Honor Cards

1NT

15~17HCPs,balanced;

2C

strong 23+HCPs,balanced;

2D

multi,under *16HCPs, equivalent 5-4 both majors;

or strong 23+HCPs with better minors;

2H

under 10HCPs 6 card Hearts,or 5 card hearts and another suiter;

2S

under 10HCPs 6 card Spades,or 5 card spades and another suiter;exception of Rule of 15 Pearson Points;

 

2NT

multi,under *16HCPs 5-4, or better 2-suiter, equivalent both minors;

or strong 23+HCPs with better majors;

 

3(4/5)C/D/H/S

preemptives with one-suiter;

3NT

gambling;

 

Rule of 15 Pearson Points;

Rule of 19 Opening Points

Rule of 500 Points(From ACOL 2005);

Some Overlays,Some Hooks;

 

New Edition is marked by *

[awm]

Again, hard to evaluate without followups.

 

How much do you really gain from excluding the 23+ hands from 1♣? My guess would be not a lot, but again depends on continuations. After all, the 23+ hand type will be very rare regardless, and 1♣ is already "always strong" and very multi-meaning (thus subject to preemption etc).

 

On the other hand, the 1♦ opening is potentially a big loser in competition. It becomes very hard for partner to compete when you could have any shape from 3316 to 3361 to 4432. Certainly it is not safe to raise either minor, or to assume a generally balanced pattern.

 

Most precision-style systems offload some of these hands from 1♦ by making use of a natural 2♣ opening. Frequency-wise, a natural intermediate 2♣ bid is way more common than 23+ points; you're going to have to be winning big on your 2♣ opens (and the fact that you didn't open 1♣ on those hands) in order to compensate for this issue.

[civill]

Sure,it's like Romex system 1.42(From geocity's "system collection",sry for the site onwer's name forgotten):

2♣/2♦/2NT strong 1NT:19~22HCPs,weak 2♥/2♠ and natural 1x with12~22HCPs;

but it's similarity,although I like Romex,especially Romex game trial.

Edited April 18, 2006 by civill

[civill]

2D

multi,under *16HCPs, equivalent 5-4 both majors;

or strong 23+HCPs with better minors;

 

2NT

multi,under *16HCPs 5-4, or better 2-suiter, equivalent both minors;

or strong 23+HCPs with better majors;

How to responde these multi 2's open bidding? Any opinions will wecome!

[civill]

"Let's go home"!