Jump to content

Unofficial Vanderbilt Scores


sdoty

Recommended Posts

Will Nickell make another of their great comebacks?

Not this time, team Hollman won by 5 imps, Welland by 38, Chang by 11

I kibitzed the end of the Nickell-Holland match. At the table Meckwell vs. Grue-Cheek, it appeared Holland was losing ground, as indeed it was; two close slams went 1 light. I saw Meckstroth go 1 down in 2 vul on board 64, then walked over to the other table just in time to see Hamman go IIRC 4 light in 3 nv against Smith-Cohen, for 7 IMPs away, or 2 more than the final margin.

 

Shugart-Moss was delayed by an appeal after the third quarter; I left about 1:40 and Shugart-Brogeland vs. the Canadians had six boards still to play. It looked from where I sat as if Shugart was holding onto the lead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I kibitzed the end of the Nickell-Holland match. [...]

I saw Meckstroth go 1 down in [...], then walked over to the other table just in time to see Hamman go IIRC 4 light in [...]

What a nice event, where Kibs are walking around, especially between the OR and the CR in a championship ... :D :D :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Final results of the quarter-finals:

 

Nickell vs. Hollman 113-118

Baze vs. Chang 124-135

Welland vs. Robinson 126-88

Moss vs. Shugart no final score, but Shugart won by 4 IMPs I have been told.

 

Semi-Final pairings:

Hollman vs. Chang

Welland vs. Shugart

 

Roland

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I kibitzed the end of the Nickell-Holland match. [...]

I saw Meckstroth go 1 down in [...], then walked over to the other table just in time to see Hamman go IIRC 4 light in [...]

What a nice event, where Kibs are walking around, especially between the OR and the CR in a championship ... :P :P ;)

The quarterfinal tables were all in the same room, with dividers set up so that players at one table couldn't see their counterparts. Kibitzers who weren't sitting quietly were asked to do so or leave the room (and a sign on the door said that if they left they couldn't come back in). I didn't see anyone shuttling from one table to the other; I only left Meckwell's table because they had finished the last board and vamoosed.

 

The semifinals will surely be in separate rooms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suspect that seeding is largely based on ACBL masterpoints so teams with international players tend to get mis-seeded.

 

Another plausible theory is that the same piss-weak appoach to providing timely web scores of this event is used by the seeding committee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The seeding is based primarily on results in comparable ACBL events (previous vanderbilts, spingolds, reisinger, etc). ACBL masterpoints do have a small amount of effect.

 

This clearly favors American teams over international teams, although certain top international players (most notably the Italians) have such a strong record in previous Spingolds/Vanderbilts as to build up a lot of seeding points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice job (again) by Mike Moss taking a 4 bagger deep into the event. I played against his teammates Zygmund and Nic, and making the round of 8 is a real accomplishment.

 

I'm rooting for my friends Bob Hollman and journeyman pro Bruce Ferguson - I hope they make it to the final.

 

Welland and co appear to be playing in top form however.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...