pbleighton Posted March 18, 2006 Report Share Posted March 18, 2006 "Wow bidding 2d on that hand seems to be a huge position even if we assume 1s may be on zero hcp." Your statement seems like a huge position to me :rolleyes: Seriously, I don't like jumping in the minors with 15 counts, unless there is a near-solid suit. The majors are a different story - with hearts with the auction 1H-1S I would probably bid 3S. Peter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awm Posted March 18, 2006 Report Share Posted March 18, 2006 Seems like the answer to this will depend on a lot of questions, among which: (1) What is 1♦-2♠ (if it's weak or invitational it reduces the possible hand types)?(2) Could the 2♦ rebid ever be a five-card suit? (3) Could the 2♠ rebid ever be a five-card suit?(4) How frequent is it for the 2♦ bidder to hold three spades?(5) What are the upper and lower limits of strength for a 2♦ bid? For Elianna and me, the answers are: (1) Strong; at least a game force with good spades.(2) Virtually never. The problem distributions are 2-4-5-2 and 1-4-5-3; with either we will rebid 1NT holding up to 15 or so hcp (with the first we might've opened 1NT with 15-16), and we will reverse into 2♥ holding a decent 16 or so and 1453.(3) Never. Even with a diamond void, the knowledge that partner has 6+ diamonds and almost never 3 spades makes pulling to 2♠ undesirable. (4) Very rare, we usually raise on three. The exceptions include very strong diamonds and usually weak spades (xxx Kx AQJTxx Qx).(5) Minimum around 11, we are willing to open a weak 2♦ on reasonable ten counts. We also jump to 3♦ fairly freely (for example Kx Ax AQJTxxx xx is a 3♦ bid, x KQx KQJxxx Axx is a 3♦ bid), so the upper range is normally 14, or occasionally 15 with a weakish suit. Under these constraints it makes sense for 2♠ to be a fairly wide range of values; we know we don't have enough for 3NT for example. Opener can raise with a hand particularly suited to playing spades opposite a known six-card suit (xxx Kx AQJTxx Qx, Kx Axxx AQxxxx x). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted March 18, 2006 Report Share Posted March 18, 2006 I cannot think of any hand that may bid over 2♠ on this sequence. Except one that bids 3♦ with ♦KQJ10xxx and ♠void. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.