Jboling Posted March 11, 2006 Report Share Posted March 11, 2006 Anyone heard of or played such a convention? Opening 2♣ with two alternatives, a. balanced hand with 17-18 points (could also be 18-19 or 19-20, whatever fits best into your system)b. weak 5-5 two-suiter, major+other It seems to work, the responses arepass = weak, (4)5+♣2♦ = all hands that does not fit into other bids. Opener bids cheaper major with a 5-5 and 2NT with a balanced hand. Opener may user higher bids to show 6-5 or better, 2♦ usually includes some strength (about 7-14)2♥/♠ = to play, against both handtypes2NT = asking, GF, normal Wilkosz responses (3NT free for balanced alternative)3♣ = invitational three-suiter, short spadeshigher = as in Wilkosz, not sure if one should use 4-level bids. 2♣-2♦-2♥-?2♠ = pass or correcthigher = natural, should probably be invitationally oriented. Could probably develop some paradox-like stuff. 2♣-2♦-2[NT]-?3♣ = Stayman3♦ = to play, all other rebids are natural GF It has a lot common with standard multi, so maybe multi-Wilkosz could be allowed where multi is allowed? It could be used even in a natural system, all you need is to use 2♦ as strong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glen Posted March 11, 2006 Report Share Posted March 11, 2006 Interesting. 2♦ could also be Multi, and handle strong hand types. Would prefer to restrict the weak hand types, so that 2♣ shows 18-19 bal or two suiter with ♠s and another suit. Then: Pass: to play2♦ transfer to ♥s - 2♠ now shows ♠s and a minor2♥ transfers to ♠s - 2♠ or 2NT shows bal, 3X shows two suiter2♠ pass or correct - pass with two suiter, bid 2NT if bal and now system on2NT strong ask3♣ pass or correct with two suiter, bid 3NT if bal without 4/5♥s, 3♠ if bal and 4/5♥s3♦ with long suit, to playetc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hrothgar Posted March 11, 2006 Report Share Posted March 11, 2006 Ice Relay used a 2♣ opening showing either weak 2♦ opening OR5+ Spades and 4+ Hearts (weak) OR23-24 HCP balanced Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrTodd13 Posted March 12, 2006 Report Share Posted March 12, 2006 Purple Twos Only 3 meanings for 2♣? How puny. Check out the above link. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Posted March 12, 2006 Report Share Posted March 12, 2006 Ice Relay used a 2♣ opening showing either weak 2♦ opening OR5+ Spades and 4+ Hearts (weak) OR23-24 HCP balanced I've played that for a while, but it's brown sticker, not allowed for 'sure'... :P Dunno what you'd like to play with 2M, but if you really want to play all 2-suiters with strong options included, following is played a lot around here:2♣ = weak with both Majors (44+, 54+, 55+, whatever you like in current vulnerability) OR semi GF OR NT 22-232♦ = weak with 1 Major OR GF any suit OR NT 24+2M = weak with 5M and 4+m (Muiderberg), which is usually 55+ when V2NT = 20-21 It works ok, but strong 3-suiters are still a problem. You obviously don't have the control like other strong openings, but they seldom come up and you have a pretty frequent 2-level opening structure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blofeld Posted March 12, 2006 Report Share Posted March 12, 2006 Ice Relay used a 2♣ opening showing either weak 2♦ opening OR5+ Spades and 4+ Hearts (weak) OR23-24 HCP balanced I've played that for a while, but it's brown sticker, not allowed for 'sure'... <_< Interesting, it's allowed in the EBU (so long as your strength for both the weak options is about the same) as all of the weak options deny the suit opened. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sigi_BC84 Posted March 12, 2006 Report Share Posted March 12, 2006 2♦ = weak with 1 Major OR GF any suit OR NT 24+ It works ok, but strong 3-suiters are still a problem. You obviously don't have the control like other strong openings, but they seldom come up and you have a pretty frequent 2-level opening structure. Why not include the strong 3-suiters into the multi as well? Did I miss something here? --Sigi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrTodd13 Posted March 12, 2006 Report Share Posted March 12, 2006 Purple Twos does multiplex the strong 4441's in with 2♣. Quit stealing my ideas man. :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
civill Posted March 13, 2006 Report Share Posted March 13, 2006 Very good ideas, but IMO, both weak two and strong two opening without clear forcing requests will transfer hard response problem to PD. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jboling Posted March 13, 2006 Author Report Share Posted March 13, 2006 Forgot to mention that 2♣-2♦ should probably be almost forcing. 2♦ is limited by the inability to bid the gameforcing 2NT, but it can be used for checking if pard has the right major, and then deciding if an invitation should be done. So it is probably quite safe for opener to pass if he intends to decline all invitations, and if he has diamonds of course. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sigi_BC84 Posted March 13, 2006 Report Share Posted March 13, 2006 Purple Twos does multiplex the strong 4441's in with 2♣. Quit stealing my ideas man. :) :-) Having a strong-three suiter in the Multi is a very common, if not standard, treatment (at least in my club, if not in most of Germany, if not in most of Europe). --Sigi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerben42 Posted March 14, 2006 Report Share Posted March 14, 2006 Having a strong-three suiter in the Multi is a very common, if not standard, treatment (at least in my club, if not in most of Germany, if not in most of Europe). I've seen it before but it seems far from standard. For me a "standard" Multi shows either:♣ (strong)♦ (strong)♥ (weak)♠ (weak)orNT (strong) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trinidad Posted March 19, 2006 Report Share Posted March 19, 2006 Having a strong-three suiter in the Multi is a very common, if not standard, treatment (at least in my club, if not in most of Germany, if not in most of Europe). I've seen it before but it seems far from standard. For me a "standard" Multi shows either:♣ (strong)♦ (strong)♥ (weak)♠ (weak)orNT (strong)Well, Gerben, the difference with your "standard Multi" is very small: This one shows either:♣ (strong) -> OUT♦ (strong) -> OUT♥ (weak) (+ side suit)♠ (weak) (+ side suit)orNT (strong) I think it shouldn't be a problem at all (but I know it is a problem since the people in power have ruled Wilkosz as Brown Sticker and Multi as an exception). Rik Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.