Jump to content

what is your favorite convention


Recommended Posts

If "convention", as opposed to "artificial call" means an agreement that would not be obviously in play to a first time player, I guess the "new suit forcing" by an unpassed responder gets the nod. Was 1C-pass-1S always played as forcing?

 

Certainly doubles were not always played for take-out, even 1C-X. This must be the most useful artifical bid. Goren won a few times playing that, Stayman, Blackwood, and not all that much more. I think I have heard that B. Jay Becker preferred not to even play Stayman, but I have never heard of anyone not playing take-out doubles. It's various cousins, close and distant, are useful.

 

Cue bids are good. They have the unusual feature of often working well even when they have not been carefully discussed. No doubt they work better with discussion though.

 

 

Ken

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Transfers are the optimum structure for forcing bids.

 

They are simply the base of many relay systems.

 

It also give the opportunity to put the known hand on the table.

 

 

Ill play any tournament without neg X before playing a system without any transfer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If "convention", as opposed to "artificial call" means an agreement that would not be obviously in play to a first time player, I guess the "new suit forcing" by an unpassed responder gets the nod. Was 1C-pass-1S always played as forcing? ...

In Culberton's Blue Book (about 1930), a new suit is not forcing, though it wouldn't be passed often--minimum opening, tolerance for the suit but not good support, etc. With game values you would jump shift. Culberson originated the term "forcing" and was one of the devlopers of the forcing principle.

 

However, the first unconditional forcing bid in Contract was the Vanderbuilt 1 opening--since it was strong but didn't promise clubs (very similar to a modern Precision 1), responder couldn't pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Favorite things:

 

In Standard: inverted minors

 

In Precision:

 

flipped positive responses to 1 club opener

10-13 NT first 3 seats regardless of vuln (in MP) and non vuln (in teams)

 

The standard conventions are fairly critical imo, transfers, splinter, RKCB, michaels, etc. weak NT isn't really a convention, but its provided quite a few entertaining auctions.

 

Eric

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

A couple of my minor favorites:

 

D of a conventional bid = the colour itself (as opposite to a take out D). Good way to find sacrifices, or leads. In some positions, feks against multi2D - to get in the bidding.

 

The stayman variation 1NT - 2Cl, 2H = hearts or both. (2NT = both is quite usual especially in my country Sweden).

These 2H lets me pass down any answer with weak but distributional hands. And it lets me invite with hearts if I do have an invite...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With a partner worse than me: Transfers

With a partner better than me: take out double

With a partner better than me who makes a take-out double of a weak 2 bid: Lebensohl

With a lucky partner: RKCB with specific King ask and 3RC ask

For fun: forcing pass 07 or 17+

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...