Fluffy Posted February 27, 2006 Report Share Posted February 27, 2006 Take out doubles are just neccesary so comes first To me splinter is second (but very far) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenberg Posted February 27, 2006 Report Share Posted February 27, 2006 If "convention", as opposed to "artificial call" means an agreement that would not be obviously in play to a first time player, I guess the "new suit forcing" by an unpassed responder gets the nod. Was 1C-pass-1S always played as forcing? Certainly doubles were not always played for take-out, even 1C-X. This must be the most useful artifical bid. Goren won a few times playing that, Stayman, Blackwood, and not all that much more. I think I have heard that B. Jay Becker preferred not to even play Stayman, but I have never heard of anyone not playing take-out doubles. It's various cousins, close and distant, are useful. Cue bids are good. They have the unusual feature of often working well even when they have not been carefully discussed. No doubt they work better with discussion though. Ken Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winstonm Posted February 27, 2006 Report Share Posted February 27, 2006 Rolling keycard kickback exclusion Gerber. :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dogsbreath Posted February 27, 2006 Report Share Posted February 27, 2006 hi all in the context of playing on BBO my favourite and most useful convention is definitely 'NMF' .. most pick-up partners readily agree to play it and when something bad happens I just say 'NMF p .. Not My Fault' :lol: Rgds Dog Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benlessard Posted February 27, 2006 Report Share Posted February 27, 2006 Transfers are the optimum structure for forcing bids. They are simply the base of many relay systems. It also give the opportunity to put the known hand on the table. Ill play any tournament without neg X before playing a system without any transfer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
civill Posted March 1, 2006 Report Share Posted March 1, 2006 Jacoby transfer is a good convention which I like most,although Jacoby was disputed in history. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikestar Posted March 1, 2006 Report Share Posted March 1, 2006 If "convention", as opposed to "artificial call" means an agreement that would not be obviously in play to a first time player, I guess the "new suit forcing" by an unpassed responder gets the nod. Was 1C-pass-1S always played as forcing? ...In Culberton's Blue Book (about 1930), a new suit is not forcing, though it wouldn't be passed often--minimum opening, tolerance for the suit but not good support, etc. With game values you would jump shift. Culberson originated the term "forcing" and was one of the devlopers of the forcing principle. However, the first unconditional forcing bid in Contract was the Vanderbuilt 1♣ opening--since it was strong but didn't promise clubs (very similar to a modern Precision 1♣), responder couldn't pass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vilgan Posted March 1, 2006 Report Share Posted March 1, 2006 Favorite things: In Standard: inverted minors In Precision: flipped positive responses to 1 club opener10-13 NT first 3 seats regardless of vuln (in MP) and non vuln (in teams) The standard conventions are fairly critical imo, transfers, splinter, RKCB, michaels, etc. weak NT isn't really a convention, but its provided quite a few entertaining auctions. Eric Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luke warm Posted March 1, 2006 Report Share Posted March 1, 2006 all things lebensohl Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tola18 Posted March 13, 2006 Report Share Posted March 13, 2006 A couple of my minor favorites: D of a conventional bid = the colour itself (as opposite to a take out D). Good way to find sacrifices, or leads. In some positions, feks against multi2D - to get in the bidding. The stayman variation 1NT - 2Cl, 2H = hearts or both. (2NT = both is quite usual especially in my country Sweden).These 2H lets me pass down any answer with weak but distributional hands. And it lets me invite with hearts if I do have an invite... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wackojack Posted March 13, 2006 Report Share Posted March 13, 2006 With a partner worse than me: TransfersWith a partner better than me: take out doubleWith a partner better than me who makes a take-out double of a weak 2 bid: LebensohlWith a lucky partner: RKCB with specific King ask and 3RC askFor fun: forcing pass 07 or 17+ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.