000002 Posted February 23, 2006 Report Share Posted February 23, 2006 The man (LHO) open his 1♥ on the 3rd position (NVul vs Vul) , partner take T/O double ,RHO pass:p p 1♥ DBP ?the hand which i hold:Q86AJT9298534Many choice to me now:pass/1NT/2♦/1♠,they are all the possible practical bidding.but , which is the best?commentate if u want,thanks. this is the actual question appeared on the fujian province(china),ilka effector will be started by each way.I will proceed after this question. regards Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike777 Posted February 23, 2006 Report Share Posted February 23, 2006 1nt seems clear but willing to listen and learn. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jlall Posted February 23, 2006 Report Share Posted February 23, 2006 spots are good enough to make me sit, especially since this 3rd seat 1H could be joker style. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P_Marlowe Posted February 23, 2006 Report Share Posted February 23, 2006 1NT. Marlowe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joker_gib Posted February 23, 2006 Report Share Posted February 23, 2006 spots are good enough to make me sit, especially since this 3rd seat 1H could be joker style. Joker style : no, no ! LOL ;) I should take the risk to pass at MP but will definitively bid 1NT at imps. Alain Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Posted February 23, 2006 Report Share Posted February 23, 2006 pass for me, but since it's asked what to do it will probably turn out wrong... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerben42 Posted February 23, 2006 Report Share Posted February 23, 2006 Pass for me also, note the nice spots in ♥. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miron Posted February 23, 2006 Report Share Posted February 23, 2006 pass. I don't like the ♥AJ109x, both ♥KQ (probably) behind me. Hearts are useless for us, and outside hears I don't have any usable honor. Pass will score probably some small plus (-1 I assume). Even 1♥x= might be good for us (better then 3NTx :-) ). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hundal Posted February 23, 2006 Report Share Posted February 23, 2006 You will probably create 2 or maybe 3 more tricks for your partner playing in hearts then any contracts played by partner except diamonds. Pass seems to be the best action. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jlall Posted February 23, 2006 Report Share Posted February 23, 2006 I should take the risk to pass at MP but will definitively bid 1NT at imps. Alain This seems strange to me. A pass is MUCH riskier in MP. In MP -160 will likely be a zero. At imps, you haven't lost much. Like if youre going set a trick in 1N, you will only lose a couple of imps anyways. Granted the reward is also higher in MP, but I do not see a pass as risky at all in imps. We aren't Xing them into game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pclayton Posted February 23, 2006 Report Share Posted February 23, 2006 I'll pass at any vul or form of scoring. Love those heart spots. Love to punish 3rd seat trash when I can. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
000002 Posted February 24, 2006 Author Report Share Posted February 24, 2006 thanks for every standpoint,and i surprise nobody mention 2♦ or 1♠. the 1st table (they name it main table) is a pair of sibling,they learnd bridge from 1991 and study it 5hours per day during 2001-2004,and win the 2005 in their province.the younger north bid the 1♠,then following:p p 1♥ DBP 1♠ P 2♦P 2♥ P 3♣P 3N P 4♠P ? Would you jump to 6♦ as the younger brother did?i will provide 4hand after this.would you help them to analyse?thanks. regards Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
000002 Posted February 27, 2006 Author Report Share Posted February 27, 2006 no any reply for it, i am sadness. this is the 4hands:[hv=n=sq86hajt92d9865c4&w=st542h65dq2cj9653&e=sk93hkq873dt3ckt7&s=saj7h4dakj74caq82]399|300|SOUTH stop ♥ leading,fineses ♣,ruff ♣ ,fineses ♠,pitch ♠on ♣A,ruff ♠ after ♠A,♦back,ruff 4th ♣ ,then lucky to ruff ♥ back by ♦ jack.make it[/hv] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hatchett Posted February 27, 2006 Report Share Posted February 27, 2006 I can see some merit to 2♦, but not 1♠ on a three card suit which just seems an unnecessary distortion compared to either bidding my long suit (2♦), or 1NT to show a heart stop and some values or passing and attempting to penalise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalvan14 Posted February 28, 2006 Report Share Posted February 28, 2006 I would have passed. Even if there is a slam, it's a bit difficult to get there, and there is no certainty you are going to make it. 1♥X is 3 off, which is a good one, in any case. If I choose not to pass (say with worse intermediates) I prefer to bid 1♠, though. It is the most sure fit, and I don't want to crucify partner if his double comes from 4-1-3-5 (not to say from 4-2-2-5, which is a possibility). I'm bringing a honor in spades, 1 A and ruffing values in clubs. Iwould not refuse playing 4♠ in a Moysian fit, if partner is strong enough Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laughter Posted February 28, 2006 Report Share Posted February 28, 2006 Personally, I would not bid 1S (avoid bidding 3 card suit when there are other sensible alternatives). But I appreciate this bid (Suit oriented values, ruffing potential, honor third in spade, may score better than NT or diamonds in MP). However, I don't like the 2H cue-bid-followed-by-3NT continuation. Advancer has a great hand for diamonds and he probably has not shown his fit yet. This sequence seems to me not particularly encouraging in exploring diamonds slam. I guess cue-bid is strength showing & seeking H stopper (default meaning of cue bid), & 3NT express doubt about the strain (contrast with direct 3NT leap). Though maybe played otherwise, I am sure mort random expert partnership would define the sequence this way. If the meaning of cue bid is fit-showing, then every bid seems reasonable(except the agreements, how does the pair explore 3NT if lacking a general-strength showing cue) I think if advancer splinter 4C over 2D, then the slam will be reached more effortlessly. Btw, if I were doubler, I would bid 2S over 2H, as I will not hide 3-card major support for long. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.