Jump to content

BPO-007E


inquiry

Recommended Posts

BPO-007E: 3H

 

I want partner to declare NT if he has a Diamond stopper. 3S would

express doubts about the Heart suit. I wish that I didn't have to

reserve double for business (I expect someone to suggest double to

show this hand). However, attaching an artificial meaning to this

double gives the opponents a license to steal...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a dissenter with oppositional defiant disorder here.

 

I selected a 4D bid. I need so little from P for 6 clubs and, at imps, 5C is OK when 3NT also makes. If P has wasted values in diamonds, perhaps I might be able to pitch a major suit loser somewhere. We have at least 11 clubs between us, likely 12. The strategy of a 3H bid is something that just didn't occur to me at the time. Not a bad idea at all, wish that I had thought of it, assuming that the opps now pass.

Perhaps a dbl of 3D should be Thrump (just kidding).

 

Another mean, rotten hand.

DHL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will anyone tell me what would 4 be in this sequence. If it is RKC in , I am all for bidding 4. The hand is too powerful to languish in 3NT.

 

Since the meaning of 4 was not known, the only options left were 5 and 6. You would have guessed by know what I would choose. 6.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't dream of stopping in 3NT on this hand. If partner has nothing wasted in diamonds I expect to be making a slam; if he has the DA in addition a grand could easily be on.

 

Don't forget partner's 2D bid is very often made on 5-card support - with a 4-card major he bids it, with diamonds well stopped he bids 2NT/3NT. It doesn't sound as if he has 4 diamonds, so he either has 5 clubs or is exactly 3334. I'm just looking forward to dropping the singleton CK offside in my 12-card fit...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 seems a pretty reasonable way forward. There's no way that I'm going to rest in 3NT here.

 

I can see that 4 might be better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I chose 4 as I would think partner would read 3 or 3 as being a natural suit. If we're going to slam and partner has xx(x) in 's, this is the only way I can get him interested.

Give me a buzz if you need a partner some day :P

 

Roland

Link to comment
Share on other sites

weird: 4 as forcing???? Sorry, I don't get it. 4 is an attempt to play the contact in 4, not a slam try.

 

Unless, of course, it is gerber? ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wanted to play the gerber-direct-king-exclusion convention, where 4C here asks for major suit kings, but I don't think that is yet part of BBO Advanced.

 

4C forcing would be a good call, but sadly it ain't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very surprised that 4C is not forcing here.

Partner made the bidding GF with his cue, 4C brings you above 3NT.

For me 4C is forcing, interested in slem and asks partner to show controls.

...For Frances and Mike: is 4C not forcing because it is not defined in the bidding poll system as forcing OR do you really play 4C as not forcing in your partnerships?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

weird: 4 as forcing???? Sorry, I don't get it. 4 is an attempt to play the contact in 4, not a slam try.

 

Unless, of course, it is gerber? :D

Hello Mike :) Perhaps that is why you are a star and we are not...? I always appreciate your postings but I have some problems with this one because I miss more arguments. When I would be interested in 3NT, I would bid a major, showing feature(s), perhaps a natural suit. Bypassing 3NT is in my partnership(s) strongest slam interest and that is what I have here imo. Perhaps it is, like so often, a matter of agreement. But weird?

Even for me 4 is not Gerber....

Caren

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bypass 3NT to bid a LONG minor suit MUST be game forcing, UNLESS partners have confirmed no stoppers in opp's suit. Even if pd 2D is not game forcing, (s)he didn't deny a diamond stopper yet, at least. To voluntarily by-pass 3NT at this position being not game forcing doesn't make sense to me.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not understand this logic. How can 4clubs be game forcing slam try?

I must either pass, bid 5clubs or make slam try? What do I do with just clubs and no interest in 3nt and non game force? I must pass or bid 3h or 3s with non game force hands?

 

I really think a 3h or 3s bid must be game force and not just an ambiguous game try.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...