Jump to content

BPO-007B


inquiry

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Wow, 2 out of 3 votes for 6D, amazing!

 

I also bid 5H, but although I agree that this is a constructive bid, I don't think that it necessarily shows a hand as good as this one. If partner really has the hand plus diamond suit that the 6 bidders are playing her for then she will likely bid 6 herself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thought about doing something other than passing, but chose Pass and hope I get a plus score. I also thought about doing something bad to lho for opening 4S, but decided against it.

 

I hate these type of hands because anything you might do could win. Any further action by me could turn a plus into a minus and vice versa. I am hoping that my controls will cover any losers that P might have. If it makes 6 or 7, well, good 4S bid, opps. Now here is one hand where I wish I had Luis' special sun glasses!!!!

 

DHL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To some extent this is clearly a complete guess. But there's certainly a problem. The following are all perfectly sound 5D overcalls:

 

xx

AQx

AKQJxxx

x

 

Probably 7H. Now take away the DJ and decide where to play...

 

x

Ax

AKQJ10xxx

xx

 

7NT

 

Kx

x

KQJ109xx

KQx

 

5D

 

xx

Axx

AQJ109xxx

-

 

probably prefer to play 5D, but partner will raise 5H.

 

x

x

AKJ109xx

KQxx

 

6C

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To some extent this is clearly a complete guess. But there's certainly a problem. The following are all perfectly sound 5D overcalls:

 

xx

AQx

AKQJxxx

x

 

Probably 7H. Now take away the DJ and decide where to play...

 

x

Ax

AKQJ10xxx

xx

 

7NT

 

Kx

x

KQJ109xx

KQx

 

5D

 

xx

Axx

AQJ109xxx

-

 

probably prefer to play 5D, but partner will raise 5H.

 

x

x

AKJ109xx

KQxx

 

6C

Frances has summed it up; it's a complete guess. 5 might be high enough, and on other perfectly normal 5 overcalls, we have a small or grand slam. This problem falls into the category of guessing rather than of judgement.

 

Roland

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frances has summed it up; it's a complete guess. 5 might be high enough, and on other perfectly normal 5 overcalls, we have a small or grand slam. This problem falls into the category of guessing rather than of judgement.

 

Roland

On average (or probability), 6D is the right choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6D is good if partner has excellent trumps. However, why should he have a semi-solid 7 card suit for bidding 5D here? He's bidding under pressure, and we should cut him some slack.

 

I chose 5H, which is hopefully at least mildly forward going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frances has summed it up; it's a complete guess. 5 might be high enough, and on other perfectly normal 5 overcalls, we have a small or grand slam. This problem falls into the category of guessing rather than of judgement.

 

Roland

On average (or probability), 6D is the right choice.

If you decide not to pass IMO 5 is a superior call to 6, as long as partner understands what you mean.

 

If it's clear that it means "I have a load of high cards, and I think we should be in slam, but I'm bidding 5H on the off-chance we have a heart fit", then partner can still bid 6D over it, and I don't think you will ever play in 6H when 6D is right, but you will play in hearts sometimes when it's right.

 

So while I agree that the most likely slam is 6D, I don't agree that bidding 6D is the correct call, even given you don't pass.

 

What I would like to bid is 5NT, with the meaning "I want to play a slam somewhere, please suggest a suit" as this brings clubs into the picture. However, I think my partner would interpret 5NT as "grand slam force", in this context meaning "I will play 7D if your suit is really solid, otherwise 6D".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I would like to bid is 5NT, with the meaning "I want to play a slam somewhere, please suggest a suit" as this brings clubs into the picture.  However, I think my partner would interpret 5NT as "grand slam force", in this context meaning "I will play 7D if your suit is really solid, otherwise 6D".

I agree that 5NT most likely will be interpreted as a grand slam invite for diamonds. If we decide to bid over 5, what about 5 as a 2-suiter then? That way we get all possible slams into the frame. Just a thought and nothing I have an agreement about at this point.

 

Roland

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bid 5, fully understanding that some of the time it will get us too high.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that 5NT most likely will be interpreted as a grand slam invite for diamonds. If we decide to bid over 5, what about 5 as a 2-suiter then? That way we get all possible slams into the frame. Just a thought and nothing I have an agreement about at this point.

And now we get to the crux of the matter:

 

In an ideal world we would like to be able to distinquish the following hand types:

 

1. Hands with Diamond tolerance that want to ask or show controls

2. Hands lacking Diamond tolerance that would like to investigate the best level/strain

3. Hands with good suits of their own that want investigate controls

 

We have a number of bids available

 

5

5

5N

6

 

And need some meta agreement that matches hand types to bids. We also need to worry about bididng space.

 

I suspect that some kind of Lebensohl/Rubensohl type treatment would work well here. We could use 5 as a marionette to 5 and differentiate between "direct" and "indirect" sequences. Direct sequences (an immediate) 5 or 5NT bid would assume Diamonds as trump. Indirect sequences would be directed at exploring other strains.

 

It would be interesting to see if any established pairs use similar methods

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dealer: West
Vul: None
Scoring: IMP
A7
KJ9872
[space]
A8543
BPO-007B

West  North East  South

(4) - 5 - (PASS) -   ?

 

Can there be a right answer to this tough one?

 

This hand is now open for discussion.

 

I don't think there's a "right" answer as 6 or 7 something COULD be on for us BUT I assume BBO advanced 4X is for penalty? (as I can't find anything contracting it ;) )

 

SO with this hand I would PASS as I would not like to penalise a P who courageously bid a SOLID 7 card (or an 8 card semi-solid) suit B)

 

If we miss slam -- just say "NICE 4 bid opps" and take my lumps :huh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BUT I assume BBO advanced 4X is for penalty? (as I can't find anything contracting it ;) )

I was certainly assuming that this double would have been takeout.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BUT I assume  BBO advanced  4X  is for penalty? (as I can't find anything contracting it  ;) )

I was certainly assuming that this double would have been takeout.

Is it relevant what double would have been?

Once partner has 7+ diamonds, he's not very likely to double whatever he's got, I would have thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...