kgr Posted January 25, 2006 Report Share Posted January 25, 2006 [hv=d=w&s=sq9xxhktxxdkqxckj]133|100|Scoring: MP[/hv]Bidding: (3♦)-P-(P)-?I had this hand in a MP event (club evening). Would you DBL or bid 3NT with this hand?How much more HCP do you need, and what do you bid then?What you rather bid at MP's, IMP's, Vuln or non-vul?PS: I play a DBL here is pure takeout, but probably - as suggested by JLall in another treat - partner should strongly consider to pass it with a flat hand at MP's Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cherdano Posted January 25, 2006 Report Share Posted January 25, 2006 I would pass this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jlall Posted January 25, 2006 Report Share Posted January 25, 2006 no no no no. I said partner should pass with a balanced hand after it goes 4S(or higher) X. That is a lot different from 3D. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Posted January 26, 2006 Report Share Posted January 26, 2006 With preempts, the vulnerability is always VERY important. NV vs V I play 5+ card preempts (very agressive, don't expect many tricks), V vs NV I need a good 7+ card suit. So there's a lot of difference... I have a ground rule after preempts, that in direct seat you need to be solid to bid, while in balancing seat you may be weaker. With the example hand I might bid 3NT, but if I'd had it in direct seat I would have to pass since it's waaaaaaaay too weak. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalvan14 Posted January 26, 2006 Report Share Posted January 26, 2006 Who has the aces? to make 3N, pard need at least 2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.