Jump to content

Worth Opening?


Echognome

Recommended Posts

Personally, I wouldn't open it.

 

However, if I were playing a method where

i) my 1NT rebid shows 11-13 balanced

ii) partner bids knowing I may have a balanced 11-count

 

then yes. I think the pretty club suit makes up for the jacks, making this not worth downgrading to a 10-count

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of my pet peeves is opening weak minor hands. First it makes it easy for the opponents to enter the bidding with a major suit overcall. Second I have always found it more difficult to out bid the majors when I have minors.

 

Assuming you open 1C you have a poor rebid over to most 1 level responses. Granted you could raise 1S to 2, which no doubt will delight your partner who responed 1S passing his 5 card D suit on Kxxx. In addtion if the enemy overcalled 2H you have to make a support dble should that tool be part of your weapons. This gives you 2 chances to delight partner when you table this trash :P .

 

If you open 1C does your partner always play you to have a real suit?

 

Lets assume you passed, how bad can it be if partner opens or overcalls or even pre-empts? Mark me down as a passer at any form of scoring. Only playing weak NT would I want to open this beauty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hold a LTC of 8 and only 2 controls and poor majors: pass

 

This is a good advertisement for 10-12 or 11-13 1N opening bids: I would be delighted (nv) to preempt with 1N :P

 

I have no objection to opening some 11 point hands, even balanced ones, but my guides for doing so are 3 controls, LTC of 7 or less, few Queens and fewer Jacks, and decent majors. None of these are, by themselves, go/no go tests, but this hand fails on all of them. The internal texture of the suit, a countervailing indicator, is insufficent to offset all this negativity.

 

However, I hope that I am playing semi-forcing 1N responses by a passed hand, since I am otherwise (and maybe, anyway) going to be in trouble should partner open 1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not an opener for me.

 

Reverse the minors, and I might open 1C. NOT A TYPO. With Jxx-Jx-QJ10xx-AQx, I might open 1C. The additional features pushing me toward that 1C opening are (1) to suggest a lead -- I do not want a lead AT my QJ10 -- and (2) to frustrate my LHO from an easy call with 4414 pattern. 1C also allows a 1D response, which I should be able to raise in comp or balance with this hand. It still would be an opt out, but closer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matt, playing your model's parameters then:

 

Recently I passed a hand like this first seat vul. during a tourney. I thought opening the hand was very close but partner yelled director and reported a Psyche by me. This is what he said

 

 

"...not even close....its 11 highs....we open all average or near average 11s....

 

To pass an 11 count...you need a real dog, like less than a quick trick...bad spot cards, etc....

 

this hand is actually a tad bit above average with 1.5 quicks and a great suit...offset slightly by the stray jacks."

 

Having partner call the director on you helps one in remembering things. :P.

 

So if this hand is an above average hand you need to open it in your style :D.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought it an interesting style question. I held:

 

KQxx

A

Txxxx

Axx

 

in response I bid 1 and 2 (natural GF) over the 1NT rebid and we ended in the no play 3NT. If I imagined partner would open the actual hand, I have to invite on this.

 

I hate opening balanced 11 counts vulnerable, and found that my bidding improved when I didn't. I wasn't out to "blame" partner, just wondered what people considered to be standard. I didn't think it a 1 opener.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought it an interesting style question.  I held:

 

KQxx

A

Txxxx

Axx

 

in response I bid 1 and 2 (natural GF) over the 1NT rebid and we ended in the no play 3NT.  If I imagined partner would open the actual hand, I have to invite on this.

 

I hate opening balanced 11 counts vulnerable, and found that my bidding improved when I didn't.  I wasn't out to "blame" partner, just wondered what people considered to be standard.  I didn't think it a 1 opener.

If you are going to play this then think 14 hcp to force to game by responder in general. Now playing XYZ or 2 way checkback the bidding would go:

 

1c=1s

1nt=2c

2s=p

p

 

1s=Walsh style, bid major over longer minor with all invite or less hands, think 13 hcp or less very often.

1nt=11-13

2c=invite checkback, 3 card support takes priority over puppet to 2D

2s=3s spades but minimum

pass

 

 

Btw this is a very typical everyday auction playing this style. Enjoy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

standard is 12 hcp or rule of 20. more then 90% of the people i know use it.

This is not standard and not played by 99.9% of players, that is the point <_<. Enjoy!

This is Barry Crane style.

If you hate his style, as many do, great, but he could win with it and he opened this stuff all the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I play 14-16 1NT with 11-13 1NT rebid (which I frequently do), I prefer to open only good 11 counts. This isn't one for me, the major jacks are too much downside.

 

I think you were a bit unlucky too in that the hands just don't mesh well. Although responder's hand has some warning signs (bad honor location) I don't think I could bring myself to only an invite opposite 11-13. What do others think?

 

Arend

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...