Jump to content

Simple question


jahol

Recommended Posts

Would you open the bidding with

 

KJ6532--KJ543--65--void?

 

Would you open with

 

KJ6532--AJ543--65--void?

 

First chair, both non-vulnerable, board a match, very good opponents, you are loosing heavily at the time of getting this hand.

 

You bid simple natural common one-suit weak two.

 

 

jahol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You will get some different answers on this, that you can be sure of. This is what I think.

 

KJ6532--KJ543--65--void?

 

Easy pass.

 

KJ6532--AJ543--65--void?

 

Close. 1 but will regret doing so if partner wants to double something.

 

Okay you got me! I opened with less than 10 HCP :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

more important than your weak two style,

would be your general system (2/1, SAYC,

Precision, ...) and what kind of 2-suiter

overcall you play in competition.

 

I pass, because I hope, I will sell this hand

better with an delayed action, this stratgy can

backfire, but it can also work.

In general: If you play specific 2-suited overcalls,

pass gets more attractive.

 

The state of the match is irrelevant, I

have never played board a match.

 

With kind regards

Marlowe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi everyone

 

Alvin Roth says to open weak two bids with 6-5 shape and rebid the second suit when the auction comes back to you(if a reasonable chance is available)

 

I do not believe that either hand will be passed out in 2Ss.

 

Partner should be informed of your bidding methods, before you try this one. ;)

 

Regards,

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi everyone

 

Alvin Roth says to open weak two bids with 6-5 shape and rebid the second suit when the auction comes back to you(if a reasonable chance is available)

 

I do not believe that either hand will be passed out in 2Ss.

 

Partner should be informed of your bidding methods, before you try this one. ;)

 

Regards,

Robert

This weak two style is also advocated by the Granovetters,

but then: At least Matthew Granovetter was heavily influenced

by Alvin Roth, at least if I remember correctly, I think

Matthew Granovetter wrote the foreword to "Picture Bidding",

and said something, which made me believe this.

 

With kind regards

Marlowe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would definitely open the second hand (1 ; I hate 2) and I'm close to opening the first, though I think I pass. State of match considerations might incline me rather to open, though.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pass first hand unless play weak 2suited openings.

But, playing BAM, and being behind in the match, first seat, nonvuln, opening it would be an acceptable gamble (ready to apologize to pard if this backfires).

 

I open the second hand 1 spade in any seat/vuln.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I quite a bit of guesswork to know whether pass or opening some nr. of spades is going to work out better. I would leave a final decision to considerations of the tactical situation at table.

I prefer the Marine's style of tactics. Jump on them with as much as you got as fast as you can. Let the Army do the fancy dancy fire and manuever stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I pass the first hand and open the second 1. I would not be surprised to lose the first board if my opp at the other table chose to open, but, try as I might, I still cannot bring myself to open either 1 or 2 with the first hand. I might well open 2 if my side suit were a minor, but it is too dangerous with (I'd bid again if I opened a weak two if at all possible)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, let us forget the previous discussion for a moment and let us look at the other side of the problem.

 

Third chair, both non-vulnerable, board a match, very good opponents, you are loosing heavily at the time of getting this hand. You have:

 

x---x---Axxx---KQJxxxx.

 

The bidding goes pass---pass. Your opening bid?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, let us forget the previous discussion for a moment and let us look at the other side of the problem.

 

Third chair, both non-vulnerable, board a match, very good opponents, you are loosing heavily at the time of getting this hand. You have:

 

x---x---Axxx---KQJxxxx.

 

The bidding goes pass---pass. Your opening bid?

Hi,

 

depends 1C or 4C.

 

The 4C bid is a bit heavy, so most likely 1C,

but I would definitly think over 4C.

According to my rules even 5C is possible,

but I am very reluctnt to open on the 5 level.

 

Marlowe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, let us forget the previous discussion for a moment and let us look at the other side of the problem.

 

Third chair, both non-vulnerable, board a match, very good opponents, you are loosing heavily at the time of getting this hand. You have:

 

x---x---Axxx---KQJxxxx.

 

The bidding goes pass---pass. Your opening bid?

I'm losing heavily? Then I need a swing. I'll try a bit of 'walking the dog'. Pass now and cover their major-suit bid later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As long as the spade suit is the longer suit I don't see a problem with opening either hand - it's impossible to show this pattern in one bid by passing and backing back in; however, with 56 pattern I would pass and hope to be able to Michael's the hand as with a preference partner will bid heart with 2/2 patterns.

 

I think the worry about partner doubling is overblown - at least at imps. At MPs I may want to pass these hands in deference to this possiblity though.

 

Winston

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...