Wackojack Posted December 11, 2005 Report Share Posted December 11, 2005 ♣[hv=d=s&v=e&w=s4hak53da104cakj42&e=sk32h92dq95cq9765]266|100|Scoring: MP1S-X-3S-Pp-X-P-4CP-P-P [/hv] Is East or West to blame for not bidding a virtually certain 5C or is North's bid of 3♠ such a good randomiser that neither can be blamed? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bearmum Posted December 11, 2005 Report Share Posted December 11, 2005 ♣[hv=d=s&v=e&w=s4hak53da104cakj42&e=sk32h92dq95cq9765]266|100|Scoring: MP1S-X-3S-Pp-X-P-4CP-P-P [/hv] Is East or West to blame for not bidding a virtually certain 5C or is North's bid of 3♠ such a good randomiser that neither can be blamed?I would have bid 4♣ over the 3♠ bid THEN P can bid the 5♣ :( :) SO to answer the question W is to blame for missing game Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
000002 Posted December 11, 2005 Report Share Posted December 11, 2005 3NT is Lebenshol in this case (how to spell?) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bearmum Posted December 11, 2005 Report Share Posted December 11, 2005 3NT is Lebenshol in this case (how to spell?) OK I don't play Lebensohl :( Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted December 11, 2005 Report Share Posted December 11, 2005 Why didn't you bid the almost cold 3NT instead? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerben42 Posted December 11, 2005 Report Share Posted December 11, 2005 3NT is Lebenshol in this case (how to spell?) Just making up conventions on the spot here, are you? If 3NT is not to play, how do you get to 3NT? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hrothgar Posted December 11, 2005 Report Share Posted December 11, 2005 3NT is Lebenshol in this case No Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luke warm Posted December 11, 2005 Report Share Posted December 11, 2005 i think east is at fault for not bidding 5c over the 2nd double (or even 3nt) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hrothgar Posted December 11, 2005 Report Share Posted December 11, 2005 Comment 1: Its unclear whether East should bid 3NT immediately following the 3♠ preemptive raise. From my perspective, the hand is bit too weak to try for game opposite a standard takeout double. Comment 2: (And this might sound crazy) I'm not fond of a direct 4♣ either. You're bypassing 3NT which might be the best place to play. Partner could very easily hold a three card club suit (2=4=4=3 or 1=4=5=3 shape's are both much more likely than catching this golden 1=4=3=5) In short, I think that East is forced too pass Comment 3: After the second double, I think that 3N stands out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jlall Posted December 11, 2005 Report Share Posted December 11, 2005 Comment 3: After the second double, I think that 3N stands out. agree completely. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
000002 Posted December 12, 2005 Report Share Posted December 12, 2005 oh is Ew in VUL?3NT is natural now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finch Posted December 12, 2005 Report Share Posted December 12, 2005 I think 5C on the East cards stands out after the 2nd double.3NT relies on there being 9 top tricks.5C needs their not to be 3 losers, which I think is more likely. Also, I might be too much of an optimist, but 5C will get a raise from partner looking at -AKxxA10xxxAKxx while 3NT won't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeh Posted December 12, 2005 Report Share Posted December 12, 2005 oh is Ew in VUL?3NT is natural now3N is NEVER lebensohl! 3N is to play whenever that is even remotely possible. On the given hand, East cannot bid over 3♠ since West may be minimum: 4♣ would be too much and East has no reason then to expect 3N to have any play. Thus pass is clear. West has an easy reopening double, and now East must 'sh*t or get off the pot', to use an old expression. 4♣ is a woeful underbid. 3N is slightly better than 5♣ in that it might not end the auction when 3N is hopeless whereas 5♣ puts all of one's eggs into that particular basket. I am probably kidding myself: it is almost impossible for West to pull 3N :rolleyes: . That would be my bid nevertheless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al_U_Card Posted December 12, 2005 Report Share Posted December 12, 2005 Seems to me that a second double (over a 2S bid) shows 17+ and over the 3S bid it must be 19 or so......3NT becomes the value bid, but 5C is reasonable at IMPS. (So I blame the 4C bidder.....as long as his pard is consistent with his 2nd doubles etc.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
000002 Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 oh is Ew in VUL?3NT is natural now3N is NEVER lebensohl! 3N is to play whenever that is even remotely possible. On the given hand, East cannot bid over 3♠ since West may be minimum: 4♣ would be too much and East has no reason then to expect 3N to have any play. Thus pass is clear. West has an easy reopening double, and now East must 'sh*t or get off the pot', to use an old expression. 4♣ is a woeful underbid. 3N is slightly better than 5♣ in that it might not end the auction when 3N is hopeless whereas 5♣ puts all of one's eggs into that particular basket. I am probably kidding myself: it is almost impossible for West to pull 3N :) . That would be my bid nevertheless. we often met a fatal-3nt ,leading by a 5cards-suit ,and a reliable entry.when it's happend,plus 100 is very very good result ,instead of minus 50. Now ,it's happen. OFCZ, the doubled contract can be made up, occasionally. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.