Gerben42 Posted November 9, 2005 Report Share Posted November 9, 2005 (edited) First a little bidding problem: [hv=d=e&v=e&s=sqt4h983dq75ct842]133|100|Scoring: IMP[/hv] RHO opens an unfavorable 3♠, two passes to partner who doubles, pass to you? And an opening lead: [hv=d=e&v=e&s=sqt4h983dq75ct842]133|100|Scoring: IMP[/hv]Opponents bid uncontestedLHO - RHO1♦ - 1♠1NT - 3♠4♠ Edit: 1NT rebid shows 12 - 143♠ is invitational, turns out this wasn't obvious. Your lead? Edited November 9, 2005 by Gerben42 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P_Marlowe Posted November 9, 2005 Report Share Posted November 9, 2005 1) 3NT, planning to bid 4C, if 3NT gets doubled Pass may work out better, but currently I feel, I select only, how do I wanna die. 2) a Trump, going passive With kind regardsMarlowe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chamaco Posted November 9, 2005 Report Share Posted November 9, 2005 RHO opens an unfavorable 3♠, two passes to partner who doubles, pass to you? Ugh....At this vulnrability I pass and pray.Even in the balancing seat pard is supposed to have substantial values and not just an 11/12 hcp with the right shape.When they do make 3S X NV, it's likely they set us 2/3 tricks in 4C doubled Vuln.At a different vuln, my choice would be even tougher though...I just hpe they do not redouble. And an opening lead: Opponents bid uncontestedLHO - RHO1♦ - 1♠1NT - 3♠4♠ Your lead? Either heart or a trump.If 3S is invitational only, I lead a trump (they might be stretching, a passive lead is likely to work- any stiff/dblton trump honor held by pard is likely to be picked anyways), if they play 3S as GF, I lead a heart. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerben42 Posted November 9, 2005 Author Report Share Posted November 9, 2005 Mauro: From your comments it seems you have the vuln. backwards? 3♠ opener is vulnerable, you are not. I agree with others that this is the only nice thing about this problem :rolleyes: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joker_gib Posted November 9, 2005 Report Share Posted November 9, 2005 1)As I don't want to pass to give them game if they make, I will also try 3NT (4!c has probably less chance to make so I go for the game and I tell partner I have a stopper) 2) close between ♥ and trump and I'll finally go for a ............. trump ! :rolleyes: Alain Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chamaco Posted November 9, 2005 Report Share Posted November 9, 2005 Mauro: From your comments it seems you have the vuln. backwards? 3♠ opener is vulnerable, you are not. I agree with others that this is the only nice thing about this problem :rolleyes: Ugh, I thought we were vuln and opps not... If the vuln is reversed, I'll try 4C Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trpltrbl Posted November 9, 2005 Report Share Posted November 9, 2005 1) 3NT 2) ♥ GBB :lol: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jlall Posted November 9, 2005 Report Share Posted November 9, 2005 1) Depends on the opps but generally 4C (unless they're juniors :lol:) I will trust my red/white opponent, and just think theyre too likely to make. I do not think 3N can be bid on a yarborough like this. If you have any play for 3N, good luck when pard starts jumping to slam or bidding 4N/4m :lol: 2) Heart. Looks like it's time to go agressive with my terrible diamond holding, we need to set up some tricks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al_U_Card Posted November 9, 2005 Report Share Posted November 9, 2005 With this dreck, I tentatively bid 4C and hope that LHO gets creative and bids 4S.... I will lead a H as a "field" lead...no point in helping the S position analysis. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike777 Posted November 9, 2005 Report Share Posted November 9, 2005 1) 4c2) lowest h Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awm Posted November 9, 2005 Report Share Posted November 9, 2005 1) Pass. I believe that most people preempt too aggressively at unfavorable. Partner must have a good hand on this auction -- if partner has a "light" balancing double then he has only one spade, in which case why did LHO holding two spades and good cards not raise to game? I like my chances at five tricks on defense a lot better than my chances of ten tricks in clubs or nine in notrumps. Certainly it is possible that 3♠X will make, in which case I have probably turned -500 into -730, but down one seems like a quite likely result here whereas a 4♣ call could still be going for 300. I'm also not convinced that if I bid, partner (who is pretty much marked with a good hand) will pass, so even if 4♣ is making or one off, we will end up in 5♣... 2) Small heart, not giving anything away. The strong hearts, if any, are likely to be in dummy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al_U_Card Posted November 9, 2005 Report Share Posted November 9, 2005 1) Pass. Certainly it is possible that 3♠X will make, in which case I have probably turned -500 into -730, but down one seems like a quite likely result here whereas a 4♣ call could still be going for 300. Usually, when my partner indicates a course of action (knowing my hand types) unless I have something more or less unexpected, I will do as asked. He would pass if he wanted to defend 3S, so passing seems pretty anti-partnership to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luis Posted November 9, 2005 Report Share Posted November 9, 2005 1. 3NT in 5 seconds with a happy expresion :-) If 3NT is doubled I stand for it. 2. Diamond automatic, trying to ruin the communications in the critical suit inmediately. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jlall Posted November 9, 2005 Report Share Posted November 9, 2005 1) Pass. I believe that most people preempt too aggressively at unfavorable. Partner must have a good hand on this auction -- if partner has a "light" balancing double then he has only one spade, in which case why did LHO holding two spades and good cards not raise to game? I like my chances at five tricks on defense a lot better than my chances of ten tricks in clubs or nine in notrumps. Certainly it is possible that 3♠X will make, in which case I have probably turned -500 into -730, but down one seems like a quite likely result here whereas a 4♣ call could still be going for 300. I'm also not convinced that if I bid, partner (who is pretty much marked with a good hand) will pass, so even if 4♣ is making or one off, we will end up in 5♣... I would agree with you adam, if they always remembered to X 4C. In practice it seems like you will often go -100 or -150 and convert that into -730 sometimes. It can be hard to X when partner has opened with a preempt, you basically need it set in your hand for sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeh Posted November 9, 2005 Report Share Posted November 9, 2005 1. 4♣. Takeout takeout doubles unless the decision is clear. Here, it is far from clear. Plus the vulnerability is the best possible for this action: if it were reversed, I'd pass. 3N, as Justin commented, is asking for trouble. It is an outright lie: and in the worst possible way. It greatly overstates one's values opposite an unlimited partner. If you knew that 3N would be doubled and that partner had a bad hand, then 3N followed by 4♣ might work: it would still be wrong, but it might work. But what if partner is sitting there with a flat 20 or so? Is there anything about the auction that says he is not? 2. ♥: I would like to play top of nothing here, but I never play that. So the small ♥ (3rd and 5th or 3rd and lowest) even tho it may mislead partner. I almost never lead trump: the old saying 'when in doubt lead trump' is a misprint. The correct saying is 'when in doubt don't lead trump'. When you are in doubt as often as I am, it is important to get these rules right :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al_U_Card Posted November 9, 2005 Report Share Posted November 9, 2005 I almost never lead trump: the old saying 'when in doubt lead trump' is a misprint. The correct saying is 'when in doubt don't lead trump'. When you are in doubt as often as I am, it is important to get these rules right :) I seem to recall it as "Only lead trump when it is right!" :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalvan14 Posted November 9, 2005 Report Share Posted November 9, 2005 1. there is something funny here: it looks like a deck without aces :D . RHO opened pre-emptive. Shall we say he might have 8 to 10 HCP?. I have 4, flat. LHO passed, so I doubt he has fast tricks (or, at least, enough fast tricks to help his pard to land a vuln game - at IMPs!!). as a consequence, pard should be quite rich :) While the first reaction would be to bid, i believe i will keep the double.2. 6♥, playing MUD. there should not be too many ruffs to prevent in LHO hand; a trump lead would be certainly neutral, but i think i might see if i can lead through LHO hearts holding Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luke warm Posted November 9, 2005 Report Share Posted November 9, 2005 1. i'd pass and lead the ♥9 2. trump leads usually are better if you think declarer might need to ruff his 2nd suit.. here i don't think he has a 2nd suit... also, lho bid the nt so i'm leading the ♥9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerben42 Posted November 10, 2005 Author Report Share Posted November 10, 2005 Hand 1:Partner had a 14-count for his double with two small Spades, and 2443 distribution. At my table I bid a confident 3NT for a happy 3 down and -150. They forgot to double, after which I would have bid SOS redouble and partner 4♦. Passing 3♠X would have given us -730. At the other table they tried 4♣ and LHO thought it was his birthday and it was. 1100. Hand 2: Any ♥ is best as this beats the contract against most declarers. A trump is 2nd best as this beats the contract against most declarers as long as partner finds the correct switch after winning the trump. A minor suit lead makes things easy for declarer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.