Jump to content

Good or poor evaluation


Rebound

Recommended Posts

[hv=d=n&s=sq1097hj1085d86cqj9]133|100|Scoring: MP

Partner's 1NT opening is passed to you. [/hv]

 

So, here's the question: do the spots make this worth a 2 response opposite a 15-17 NT?

 

Presumably, if you do respond 2 and partner bids 2 you will raise to 3, or will you? :-)

 

I suppose I should fess up that I did bid 2 with it, but I am thinking that was a bit optimistic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[hv=d=n&s=sq1097hj1085d86cqj9]133|100|Scoring: MP

Partner's 1NT opening is passed to you. [/hv]

 

So, here's the question: do the spots make this worth a 2 response opposite a 15-17 NT?

If you are opening 15-17 1NT, then I agree with Mike- pass and table a great dummy for partner.

 

I agree that hand evaluation is more than HCP. At NT I will add 1/2 point for a 5 card suit or a full point for a good 5 card suit. I add 1/2 point for good middle cards and 1/2 point for a hand with well placed honors. With this hand, you have lots of good card combinations but still can't bring the hand up to invitational value for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I tend to agree with pass, if you do choose to bid, you should pass 2 (or 2). You're already ahead of most of the field (okay assuming 15-17 NT is the common range as it is here in the states) by finding your major fit. No reason to risk -50 in 4 when +140 in 3 is beating all those +120s and +90s out there in the field. Even if game is making, don't you figure to get a near-top for +170 when most people played in 1NT?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello everyone

 

Pass in tempo. Flat hands up to @8HCP hands should pass opposite a 15-17HCP except vul. at IMPs.

 

If I did use somehow use Stayman, I would pass a 2M reply in tempo when I 'looked' again(didn't I have a King somewhere in this hand?)

 

If I played garbage Stayman(not my style because it does not fit into my methods)

I would use it here and pass 2M in tempo.

 

I ran a bunch of hands using garbage Stayman and the results were above average. 4-3 fits were generally playable and many 4-4 fits were found.

 

It was just that the use of garbage Stayman cost me my other superior methods of bidding over 1NT. Why use a X% better method when your currect method is X+% better?

 

I also used to bid game with 9HCP opposite a 15-17NT. I ran a number of hands opposite that range and found that I should 'only' invite with 2NT. Perhaps because I also use 1NT-2NT* as showing diamonds, my invitational bidding is somewhat cramped.

 

My early agreement that a Precision 1C*-8+HCP forced to game followed me for too many years. I did not like to play 1C*-1NT=8-10-2NT=16-p-p-p which the red covered Precision Book suggested.

 

I am not a diehard conservative bridge player. I am currently testing using 7+HCP positives as being game forcing opposite my 16+HCP(18+HCP if balanced)

1C* bid in a Big Club system(only when Vulernable at IMPs)

 

7+HCP positives narrow that worrysome 1C-1D bid to zero to a poor seven HCP.

 

The other pair cannot freely double an auction that reveals the threadbare nature of your 1C*-1D-1M-2M-3M-4M which almost demands a double 'if the trump suit is breaking badly.'

 

If you direct your bidding towards IMPs it looks like a good idea. At matchpoints, I am willing to require 8HCPs for a GF positive.

 

Regards,

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...