Jump to content

Have you ever downgraded by 2 pts before?


cherdano

Recommended Posts

I like my shape, and I like my minor spots.

 

I think I'd open this 1NT playing 15-17. On the other hand, I might also open it 1NT playing 12-14.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was watching when this hand came up...

There were a number of different opinions regarding hand evaluation.

 

From my perspective, 14-16 NT is dead on. I'd feel a bit less happy about a 15-17 NT, but would probably open this as well since it feels more accurate than 1 or, worse yet, 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Playing 14-16 NT with Han, I was very close to do so, holding

AJ AQ J8xx QJ9xx.

 

What do you think? Of course I ended up opening 1NT anyway, but would you consider 1,maybe with worse spots in the minors?

 

Arend

I would open 1N and accept the invite hehe... QJ9xx is really good imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can see:

 

QJxx

QJxx

KQ

KQx

 

Being downgraded to 1 opener playing a 15-17 NT. But this is an extreme.

 

A lot of good players say - they frequently upgrade and never downgrade. This is an egotistic approach. If you want to play a 14-16 NT and call it a 15-17 because of all the upgrading you do, go ahead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Playing 14-16 NT with Han, I was very close to do so, holding

AJ AQ J8xx QJ9xx.

 

What do you think? Of course I ended up opening 1NT anyway, but would you consider 1,maybe with worse spots in the minors?

 

Arend

I think playing 14-16, I would consider it a nobrainer 1NT.

 

Even playing 15-17 I'd still open 1NT for the reasons below.

 

Not having 4 card majors, and especially holding 5 clubs and 4D, I much prefer to risk a slight overbid of 1NT.

 

Potential pluses:

- anticipates competition in the partscore from opps

- immediate description of the hand-type

- honors in short suit are not necessarily wasted

- in the given hand, the quacks are in the long suits and pull their weight; I like to count the Q of hearts as full value, being accompanied by the Ace; I MIGHT discount the J of spade, but still, the AJ tenace does not look all that bad if pard has a little something in spades.

 

Potential minus:

- pard may go overboard

- we might lose a partscore when we could compete to 3m

 

All in all, I like the pluses better than the minuses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...