Jump to content

What to do with this hand


mr1303

Recommended Posts

Playing Acol, weak NT, 4 card majors.

 

[hv=d=s&v=b&s=saqtxhatxxdqxxckx]133|100|Scoring: IMP[/hv]

 

Bidding procedes:

 

1H (2C) 2H (3C)

to you

 

What do you bid now? Partner's 2H is fairly similar to a 2/1 or SAYC 2H bid in competition, as far as our agreements go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm also passing. I can't see any attractive bids, and I can't see much that goes wrong if I pass.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My club holding makes me worry that a double is too dangerous.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

pass. I have no game interest, only 4 trumps and a balanced hand with lots of defense.

Indeed. So do you fancy doubling?

X is ok but I'd like even more defense. My CK is pretty dubious as roland said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dbl.

 

Invitational.

 

What would I have bid after the

raise with no competition? 3H.

 

With kind regards

Marlowe

I would not opposite a single raise, and especially not now that my opponents have told me that my K is most likley not worth the 3 hcp I counted when I picked my hand up.

 

Roland

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do people play this double? Is this

 

a ) a command for partner to pass?

b ) a request for partner to do the right thing?

 

b ), mainly with the focus of playing 3H or 4H.

It is not a penalty double.

 

Marlowe

I was about to argue with you until I reread your post and found we agree on b :)

 

However, were the scoring MPs instead, I think partner should pass the double as often as not at these colours if in the upper range and not in posession of a 9-card trump fit, even if not holding anything special in the enemy suit. Typically, the three level is for the opponents, and plus 200 would be great where minus 100 might be a disaster - although I admit this is just my opinion. Sometimes I like to gamble a little when the payoff is big enough and to me, +200 on a partscore hand at matchpoints is a humungous payoff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I understand of Acol, which is not a lot, partner does not show 4 trumps with 2.

 

Luckily I have a nice bid to describe my hand now, pass, since after the 2 overcall I devalue my hand to be a weak NT hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyway, I decided to double, which was risky since partner decided to leave it in. He held:

 

xxx

Qxxx

Kxxx

xx

 

and we duly wrote down -670 on the card. I pointed out that double was not 100% for penalty, and that with 4 trumps and a 5 count, he should pull. He disagreed, saying that doubles are for penalty once we've found a fit.

 

Oh well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyway, I decided to double, which was risky since partner decided to leave it in. He held:

 

xxx

Qxxx

Kxxx

xx

 

and we duly wrote down -670 on the card. I pointed out that double was not 100% for penalty, and that with 4 trumps and a 5 count, he should pull. He disagreed, saying that doubles are for penalty once we've found a fit.

 

Oh well.

It all depends on your agreement. Is double penalty or not, or is it a game try in hearts? No matter what, as previously said, you don't have a double with that hand. You have no penalty of 3 and you have no game try opposite a single raise.

 

This has become a likely 12 count on the auction.

 

Roland

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a frequently-repeated debate.

I play double as penalties here (and no, I wouldn't have doubled... though I might at matchpoints). I also wouldn't have pulled on your partner's hand.

 

But it's all a matter of agreement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Playing Acol, weak NT, 4 card majors.

 

[hv=d=s&v=b&s=saqtxhatxxdqxxckx]133|100|Scoring: IMP[/hv]

 

Bidding procedes:

 

1H (2C) 2H (3C)

to you

 

What do you bid now? Partner's 2H is fairly similar to a 2/1 or SAYC 2H bid in competition, as far as our agreements go.

easy pass for IMP, for MP, I'd double

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would probably pass over 3.

A double would show a 16-17 HCP balanced hand, and would leave the decision for the final contract to partner (but with his cards, minimum 2 bid, 4 trumps and 1 trick or less in defense i would certainly bid 3 over the double).

let me amend my 1st statement: I would pass at IMPs, but would double at MPs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...