han Posted October 10, 2005 Report Share Posted October 10, 2005 [hv=d=w&v=b&s=sahk10xxxdk9xxcaxx]133|100|Scoring: IMP[/hv] I went for a big number with the above hand. The auction was 1S-p-2S to me, and I bid 3H, ouch! Pretty clear now to me that I should have doubled instead. How clear do you think that is? How much would the heart suit need to change before you would bid 3H? btw, My partner was trying to help as much as possible, even his name said Double ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elianna Posted October 10, 2005 Report Share Posted October 10, 2005 [hv=d=w&v=b&s=sahk10xxxdk9xxcaxx]133|100|Scoring: IMP[/hv] I went for a big number with the above hand. The auction was 1S-p-2S to me, and I bid 3H, ouch! Pretty clear now to me that I should have doubled instead. How clear do you think that is? How much would the heart suit need to change before you would bid 3H? btw, My partner was trying to help as much as possible, even his name said Double ! I think that you'd have to make my heart heart suit something like AKTxxx to bid 3H instead of doubling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike777 Posted October 10, 2005 Report Share Posted October 10, 2005 KQT9xx, AKxxxx, etc for me. but these things are always easier away from the table. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jlall Posted October 10, 2005 Report Share Posted October 10, 2005 Agree X is clear. I think I'd X with any hand that had this shape. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winstonm Posted October 10, 2005 Report Share Posted October 10, 2005 With this shape and HCP range, I can't come up with a hand that I'd bid 3H unless maybe x, AKQJx, xxxx, Axx. Even with x, AKQxx, Jxxx, Axx I prefer the double. Winston Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
000002 Posted October 10, 2005 Report Share Posted October 10, 2005 3suiters here , not ♥only Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joker_gib Posted October 10, 2005 Report Share Posted October 10, 2005 Yes, ♥ suit is awful for that position and you have support for all other suits so Dbl is clearly better, imho Alain Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P_Marlowe Posted October 10, 2005 Report Share Posted October 10, 2005 Hi, if you bid, and bidding is not clear cut,double is better, 3H should show a fairlysolid 6 card suit and something on the side,because they will kill you, if it is right. ... Depending on the strength of your opponents you do not even disturb thereconstructive bidding, because they will havemaximal doubles to invite. With kind regardsMarlowe PS: You should also ask the oppoenents, if theyplay constructive raises, which would make biddingeven more dangerous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted October 10, 2005 Report Share Posted October 10, 2005 Do you have to bid NOW? Yes, because pard, with lenght in spades and weakish hand, will never dare to reopen. What to bid? Double is probably better because it doesn't put the eggs all in one basket, like 3♥ does. Besides, if pard has a minor suit to run to, he'll have to bid it at the FOUR level. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inquiry Posted October 10, 2005 Report Share Posted October 10, 2005 Bidding is clear, or they will steal you blind. But the bid should be double (of course). And, no equal level conversion. If partner doesn't bid ♥, they maybe lost. That is harsh, but introducitong hearts with your sides first bid at the three level vul on King-ten empty fifth at imps is, as Martha Stewart would say if she played bridged... "(not) a good thing." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P_Marlowe Posted October 10, 2005 Report Share Posted October 10, 2005 Do you have to bid NOW? Yes, because pard, with lenght in spades and weakish hand, will never dare to reopen. What to bid? Double is probably better because it doesn't put the eggs all in one basket, like 3♥ does. Besides, if pard has a minor suit to run to, he'll have to bid it at the FOUR level. If you want to bid, do it, but accept 800-1100. How high are the chance, that you have game?If you believe the risk is worth it, go ahead,but I would pass.Of course if you do it regular, ask the opponentto have merci with you, and that they do not doubleyou at the 3 level. I may be tempted, if the Ace of spades would be the Ace of hearts / diamonds, but it is not clear, switch the mayors and double is clear,but then ... I have the chance to play on the 2 level. With kind regardsMarlowe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
han Posted October 10, 2005 Author Report Share Posted October 10, 2005 I would never dare,to pass on this hand,as I would be afraid that,I would be known as somebody of whom,you can easily steal. :) As a side question, if I do double, what should partner's 2NT call be? Should it be lebensohl (G/B 2NT), or should it show 2 different places to play? I prefer the second treatment, so that you can double more often with less than perfect shape and still land on your feet. My honorable partner prefers to play 2NT as lebensohl here, and I can certainly see the merits of that treatment. What do you prefer? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P_Marlowe Posted October 10, 2005 Report Share Posted October 10, 2005 I would never dare,to pass on this hand,as I would be afraid that,I would be known as somebody of whom,you can easily steal. :) As a side question, if I do double, what should partner's 2NT call be? Should it be lebensohl (G/B 2NT), or should it show 2 different places to play? I prefer the second treatment, so that you can double more often with less than perfect shape and still land on your feet. My honorable partner prefers to play 2NT as lebensohl here, and I can certainly see the merits of that treatment. What do you prefer? Hi, I would suggest, to play 2NT as kind of scrambling,i.e. the 2NT bidder asks for the better minor.If you go in, at least you should have a safety net. With kind regardsMarlowe PS: S.J. Simon wrote in his famous book once,"The Poker player who never gets bluffed, is a losing player, similar, If you dont allow the opponents to robyou once, you will loose more in the end." This statement was meant with regards to how to handlepsych bids, but it easily fits here". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pclayton Posted October 10, 2005 Report Share Posted October 10, 2005 Its tougher at MPs where -1400 is just another zero. A 5-3 heart fit can make all the difference. At Imps - we should be able to find our best fit with a scrambling 2N by pard. Yeah I pre-balance with this hand. In spite of my anti-OBAR mentality, I don't expect pard to reopen on his balanced 6 count. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jlall Posted October 10, 2005 Report Share Posted October 10, 2005 2N scrambling for sure. It's more important to get to the right suit than the right level (which you can guess with some accuracy) especially after theyve opened and responded. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cherdano Posted October 10, 2005 Report Share Posted October 10, 2005 Double! was 100% clear. I would even be tempted to double with 2=5=3=3 and would most likely do so with 2=3=(53). What is everybody else's default bid with these shapes (assuming you are strong enough to take action)? Arend Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jlall Posted October 10, 2005 Report Share Posted October 10, 2005 5332 with 2S my default action is X. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luke warm Posted October 10, 2005 Report Share Posted October 10, 2005 klinger: SITES TOXIC ShortInTheEnemy'sSuit? TakeOutXIsCorrect and he does it with less than perfect shape, though with more strength for off shape hands Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted October 11, 2005 Report Share Posted October 11, 2005 I need a 6th ♥ or maybe KQJ10 althou that is close and maybe will double as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
000002 Posted October 11, 2005 Report Share Posted October 11, 2005 W~~~~~N~~~~~~E~~~~~S1♠-----PASS------2♠----DBLPASS-----2NT? GB2NT HERE:1)north (only )40% has a 4cards longest suit;and 1/4 is ♥,1/4 is ♠2)opps 16 hcp(total) is likely3)too hard to penalize me unless openner redbl,but u can bid pass to show a flat hand now good regards Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P_Marlowe Posted October 11, 2005 Report Share Posted October 11, 2005 W~~~~~N~~~~~~E~~~~~S1♠-----PASS------2♠----DBLPASS-----2NT?<snip>3)too hard to penalize me unless openner redbl,but u can bid pass to show a flat hand now good regards Another option is, that responder doubles showing some defensive values, and after that ... game over. With kind regardsMarlowe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted October 11, 2005 Report Share Posted October 11, 2005 Do you have to bid NOW? Yes, because pard, with lenght in spades and weakish hand, will never dare to reopen.If you want to bid, do it, but accept 800-1100. How high are the chance, that you have game?If you believe the risk is worth it, go ahead,but I would pass.Of course if you do it regular, ask the opponentto have merci with you, and that they do not doubleyou at the 3 level. Bridge is an attacking game, where being bold and aggressive usually grants you better rewards than acting passively and letting fate decide your score. I learned this from experience, not from books. The only risk of bidding here is tipping off a few keycards if opps end up in 4♠. But, of course, butting-in doesn't mean you don't have to be careful. In this case, being careful means bringing the three open suits to play, not just hearts. Bidding 3♥ is probably too risky, yes. But doubling rates to be just fine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blofeld Posted October 11, 2005 Report Share Posted October 11, 2005 I think it's a little unreasonable to say that that's the only risk, whereagles. I'm certainly going to double, but I accept that once in a while my doubling will result in us going for a number at the three level. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted October 11, 2005 Report Share Posted October 11, 2005 Look, obviously things can go wrong every now and then. But to think about worst-case-scenarios every time one has a non-clear-cut decision is a quick and unpleasant way to be jerked off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.