Prec sequence: 1D-1M-3oM (natural 6D5oM)

[Chamaco]

Hi all !

Yet another question for a Precision 1D sequence.

 

Right now we play that the following uncontested sequence shows a natural 6D5oM (or better) by opener, with a maximum of 12 hcp (13+ hcp with 65 or better are opened with conventional "strong" 2-suited openers):

 

1D...1M

3oM

 

Sample hand:

QTxxx-void-AKxxxx-xx

 

 

The question is:

do you have simple suggestions for responder for slam investigation, enabling him to set trumps, check for side controls and ask keycards ?

 

Yes I know, I might use "Multireverse" (cheapest reverse, in this case, 2oM), to show several hand types, including this 65, enabling responder to investigate at a lower level, but right now tis would put my pard's memory under too much strain. :(

[helene_t]

4♣ sets oM as trump.

 

That's simple, isn't it? :(

[MarceldB]

The main problem is that the 1♥ responder could be weak too. Thus 4♦ to play must be in the fraimwork. So an End Signal is difficult to use.

 

Underneath a suggestion.

 

3NT= to play

4♣= distribution asking

4♦= to play

4♥= not interested in void or 1/1 side suits and SLam Asking bid ♦

4♠= to play

4NT= not interested in void or 1/1 side suits and SLam Asking bid ♠

5♣= SLab♦ but only interested in AK ♦

5♦= to play

5♥= AK♠?

5♠= AKQ♠? and not forcing-> 5NT= side Queen, 6x=Side K,

 

4♣ - ?

4♦=void lowest side suit -> 4♥= SLab♦, 4♠= to play, 4NT=SLab♠,5♦=to play

4♥= void highest side suit -> 4♠= to play, 4NT=SLab♦,5♣=SLab♠,5♦=to play

4♠ en higher= 1/1 (will not be a disappointment for partner) and at the same time SLAB answers with ♦ provisionally as trump (if partner bids ♠= to play)

 

SLab answers:

step1= 1 Ace of 5 (or 4 if a void)

step2= 1 Ace + Trump Queen

step3= 0 or 3 Aces

step 4= 2 Aces

step 5 = 2 Aces + trump Queen

 

OR if you don't like Slab's then f.e. Spiral Scan (eventually with the restriction that Relayer still has set the trumpsuit with his bid).

 

====

 

I hope it answers your request for simplicity? :(

To have a possibility to inform -if important- for the right void is in my opinion a main issue. Reason why such an example scheme is hardly inevitable.

 

Marcel