Guest Jlall Posted September 20, 2005 Report Share Posted September 20, 2005 Does ZAR take into account the T98 of hearts? From your analysis it would seem not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inquiry Posted September 20, 2005 Report Share Posted September 20, 2005 Does ZAR take into account the T98 of hearts? From your analysis it would seem not. As I said in the ZAR post a few days ago, one problem with ZAR is it treats, KJ5432 the same as KJ9876.... so no, just like three days ago, Zar still ignores the T98 of hearts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jlall Posted September 20, 2005 Report Share Posted September 20, 2005 Does ZAR take into account the T98 of hearts? From your analysis it would seem not. As I said in the ZAR post a few days ago, one problem with ZAR is it treats, KJ5432 the same as KJ9876.... so no, just like three days ago, Zar still ignores the T98 of hearts. Sorry I stopped reading the thread (for obvious reasons). I did not know if there was some adjustment from the base count for the T98. I think the T98 is what makes this hand really powerful. Even opposite a stiff you have a decent shot at a 1 loser suit, and opposite something like Jx or xx they really come into play. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.