[hv=pc=n&s=shdc&w=sjt987hkdaqt876c6&n=shdc&e=sak642haq982d4ca7]399|300[/hv] North South holdings immaterial bIDDING E 1S S P W 2D N p E 2H S p W 3C N p E 3H S p W 4nt N p E 5D s p W 6P a friendly accusation by both p and opposition is that me W mislead both partner and opposition in my bidding. After a S open i'm immediately thinking slam and must keep making forcing bids( which are weakness for both of us) E/W use roman key card so my p is always thinking H. i am confident that even if she ( my wife) shows 2 key cards and Q of H i can still go 6 S. when she shows 3 A i go 6 and she makes seven with a finesse. so am i being disingenious in my bidding OR how do you bid to get to at least 6 S. ( a jump to 4 is considered weak
my p and i play 2nt over pa open of a minor showing 10/12 hcp and no 4 card major. we got disconbobulated on the folliowing bidding sequence. me 1C LHOP 1S P 2 nt pass me/ ?? What does the 2nt say here
I have heard the expression syms off syms on after interference. i know 1nt-2C X is stole my bid and is stayman. ACBL says syms off after any int. bid. I can see with many conventional bids after 1NT it may not make sense to ask for a transfer to a major. BUT if you know your OPs CC why not bid X over 2D ( stole my bid) to transfer to H or bid 2H to ask for S. MY idea is to alert this. MY ftf partner play this way and today i was told in no uncertain terms i cannot do this and i was making an unsportsmanlike bid. Please help 123600
Most bridge books give advice on advancing an overcall, but they all give examples of no interference by responder. How are advances changed when there is interference by a responder. This is more likely the case. TKS
A renag occured third last trick by declarer playing a trump on lead from board.Picked up later and remaining play from that point fwd. was reconstructed and determined that defenders would not have got a trick in any event. No penalty was applied. Is this correct?