I'm a long time member. I play at tables quite often. I play some robot tourneys, but because I don't know too many people or often cannot play for a long time, as of yesterday I had played I think only seven tournaments in the last 7 months that involved people. But, I finished all of them. I should be able to play if I want to. This policy is presuming me guilty until proven innocent. I'm a serious player, 325 MP in the ACBL, a qualified director, and I NEVER leave in the middle of a hand or tournament, even a robot one. I've been a mentor in the BIL. However, I am almost NEVER going to be playing 10 tournaments a month to keep up my "qualification". So as of now I get refused on a lot of your tourneys. This is just morally wrong. And, you're losing money. You need to rethink the formula, using more data than just tournaments in a month. For example, I've been a member a long time and my table completion rate is 100%, and I have 20+ BBO points -- surely that is presumptive evidence that I'm not a runner. And if I had the moral character not to run last year, is that not something?