I have recently read Glen Ashton's "ETM Gold" system and I want to ask your opinion about some ideas included there. 2 over 1 responses to 1 of a major opening 2♣ is either: - GF with balanced hand. May have 3 or longer in M, intending on finding out about opener’s hand instead of showing hand type - GF with long minor, not five or longer in OM, and not exactly 3 in M 2♦ over 1♥ and 2♥ over 1♠ is: - 3 in M or 4 in M with 4-3-3-3, and GI or better values, denies 5+ in the OM 2♦ over 1♠ opening is: - 6+♥s, fewer than 3♠s, any strength that meets requirements for responding to an opening bid - 5+♥s, 3+♠s, GI - GF with 5+♥s, may have 3+♠s. Artificial and quite sophisticated continuations over these responses (especially 2♣) What are your thoughts on that and how well may it work with limited openings (11-17)