andrei

Hillarious Get help

Who knows? The article is 23 years old and I somehow doubt the scam have been discovered in its infancy. It seems, per State Department, that people delivered by midwives in Texas have been denied passports before, under both Bush/Obama. The base had to be re-energized, so Wash. Post obliged.

LOL, did you even read the article? So what do you think, were the midwives criminals? Same source This was 1995 Bill Clinton Racist

Rio Grande Midwives Deliver Citizenship : A birth certificate scam sheds light on a thriving network of women who help Mexican mothers have babies in Texas. Under lax laws, they can declare the newborns Americans. Maybe reading something else than WP would help ...

It seems you forgot to dispute "Obama assured the Russian President he'd have "more flexibility" on missile defense systems after his next election" POTUS quote.

obama-more-flexibility-russia

Thank you for clarification. Why are Democrats so worried about trailer park boys? Aren't they Republican most trusted voters? :)

So to vote in UK one needs a valid photo ID? No "disenfranchise" issues there?

angry white man?

Obama cyber chief confirms 'stand down' order against Russian cyberattacks in summer 2016

Father says little Honduran girl on Time cover was not taken from mother

Larry's link says 54%. Yours says 60%. There is some work to do to get to 90%.

This one? " In recent months, the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR), the agency within the U.S. Department of Justice that adjudicates immigration removal cases, released data showing that the vast majority of families do in fact show up for court dates. This data, however, has been misconstrued—some have even claimed that 85 percent of mothers are not appearing for their hearings. " LOL Try better ...

Still waiting to see the studies that show that 90% rate you claim.

Apparently hrothgar heard of studies saying that 90% goes to court. The linked linked states the most recent estimate is that 46% skip court. So I was asking if hrothgar was making up his "90% goes to court" number.

Where is your 90% coming from? You weren't just making up numbers, were you?

Do you mean to say that hrothgar started spewing vulgarities only after Trump came to the stage? He is doing it since the beginning of mankind (err... peoplekind).

When did Graham "told CNN he lied about the "shithole" remark"? https://nypost.com/2018/01/12/graham-says-he-confronted-trump-over-comments/

This hasn't ever happened, has it?

Still standing by your little fantasy story about Steele and the dossier?

LOL guys, did you read the memo? It is funny how you pretend to be so smart but you lack basic comprehension skills. " On October 21, 2016, DOJ and FBI sought and received a FISA probable cause order (not under Title VII) authorizing electronic surveillance on Carter Page from the FISC. ...... The FBI and DOJ obtained one initial FISA warrant targeting Carter Page and three FISA renewals from the FISC. As required by statute (50 U.S.C. §1805(d)(1)), a FISA order on an American citizen must be renewed by the FISC every 90 days and each renewal requires a separate finding of probable cause. " It seems Nunes is well aware probable cause is what is needed for a FISA warrant. Now here is the entire highest standard quote: " Due to the sensitive nature of foreign intelligence activity, FISA submissions (including renewals) before the FISC are classified. As such, the public's confidence in the integrity of the FISA process depends on the court's ability to hold the government to the highest standard ­— particularly as it relates to surveillance of American citizens. However, the FISC's rigor in protecting the rights of Americans, which is reinforced by 90-day renewals of surveillance orders, is necessarily dependent on the government's production to the court of all material and relevant facts. This should include information potentially favorable to the target of the FISA application that is known by the government. " Did it really seem to you he is speaking here about proof beyond reasonable doubt? He says government should act beyond reproach when requesting FISA warrants. This is obviously so far remote from the truth is not even funny. https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/the-digger-who-commissioned-the-trump-russia-dossier-speaks " Simpson, who founded Fusion GPS in 2010, began his testimony by explaining his background as an investigative reporter at the Wall Street Journal and at Roll Call. .... But in September or October of 2015—Simpson was vague about the exact date—a client hired Fusion GPS to investigate Donald Trump. (The Washington Free Beacon, a conservative Web site that has received funding from the hedge-fund billionaire Paul Singer, has acknowledged hiring Fusion GPS to investigate candidates during the Republican Presidential primaries.) Simpson said the mandate was to carry out an “open-ended” examination of Trump’s business record, including his bankruptcies, and, he added, “it evolved somewhat quickly into issues of his relationship to organized-crime figures.” ..... Things changed in the spring of 2016, after Fusion GPS got a new client, which we now know to have been the Clinton campaign and the D.N.C. (This fact emerged in October, well after Simpson’s testimony, when lawyers from the Judiciary Committee demanded Fusion GPS’s bank records.) In “May or June of 2016,” Simpson recalled, he engaged Christopher Steele, an old associate of his, who was the former head of the Russia desk at the British foreign-intelligence agency, MI6. He and Steele, who was by then running his own intelligence consultancy in the U.K., shared an interest in the Russian kleptocracy and in organized-crime issues, Simpson said. "

I am willing to bet my life this is the reason FBI does not want memo released:

Of course you do. An unnamed source familiar to the matter said so. If the memo will be out, said source will have more other things to say regarding it.

LOL We already knew they are asking for the memo to be withhold because it can damage national security. All this "contains inaccurate information and paints a false narrative" is just BS.

A person familiar with the matter, LOL. Is this the same person who knew that Rex Tillerson would be out as SoS 2 month ago?