georgi

Unless if it's with jump. Like: 1♦ - 1♠ 2♣ - 3♥ Here it's not FSF, but two-suited invite. Similar for: 1♣ - 1♥ 1♠ - 3♦

Both cases will be fixed in next GIB version.

Thanks. Maybe too small percentage of happening for hundreds games. Maybe the simulation should be disabled here.

No. It's due bug. Fixed in next update. North will bid 2NT.

Thanks for reporting, will be fixed.

Thank you :)

Openings in 4th seat about preempts will be addressed. Likely in the next version, changing the explanations as well.

I assume you never do any kind of mistakes in typing, writing, working and any -ing tasks.

Fixed in the next update. 1NT will show 6-9, 2NT - 10-12. Thereby, the only bid for North would be 2NT.

To bid on 2nd level GIB requires 11+TP, to bid on 3rd level GIB requires 14+TP. And always new suit is forcing at least for 1 round, so GIB won't and would expect as well partner not to pass it.

After 1NT ( balanced points ) was included recently in 4th seat, the points for NT-minors needed to be tweaked a bit. So they are: 2NT ( in NV ) 15+ TP 2NT ( in V ) 17+ TP. East having 15TP qualifies for 2NT in NV, but not here. Heart suit doesn't match the suit quality requirement ( if not wrong QJ+), which diamond suit does.

3♠ - Natural, not forcing -- 2- ♦; twice rebiddable ♠; 7-9 total points but having maximum 3 cards in opening. Otherwise it fits the requirements for 3♠. Let say if the opening was 1♣ - 2NT (♦+♥) North would bid 3♠.

1NT rebid is fixed for the next update. There was a bug making this call to be skipped. Length explanations are also fixed. Where is the typo in the explanation(s)?

According to GIB, 2♥ requires 11+TP, not 14+. Upper hand has 9TP so can't qualify for 2♥. But even if can, 2♥ is 1R forcing. Anyway, is there a chance that hand to be given in some link or at least to be full? The hanging in the air 2♦ bid is not possible to be replicated in neither of the previous 2 versions. The only possible bid which might comes up is 2♥, although rare. (IMP and MP scoring taken into account).

Supposedly should qualify better for direct 3♣ - strong rebiddable X; 13+ total points. Adjusted for the next update.

It's a bug pass. It will be addressed for the next update.

GIB has a bid to give here. 2♥, showing 4+♦ and limit raise or better. Raise in opening is competitive raise, weaker. Fixed for the next update.

Actually the rule beneath 4♥ was ok, just the explanation given carries bad info. So GIB would understand the call. Fixed for the next updated where 4♥ or other suit in the same meaning will show - -- strong rebiddable X; 15+ total points

There was a bug in the minor rebids which did not present in major opening and rebid i.e. p-p-p-1♥-1♠-p-p-2♥/3♥. 2♥/3♥ promises 6+ in the opening and respectively 15+ and 20-22TP. Similar for minors. In the upper hand, the bid used to promise just 4+ and 12-22TP. Fixed for the next update, also the cases where RHO is the balanced side after two passes.

It will be investigated.

It's supposedly 7-9TP, it will be fixed.

There is explanation for the call of 4♠ - Double jump raise -- 3+ ♦; 4+ ♠; 21- HCP; 19-22 total points Probably not appeared for some reason.

There was a bug after 4NT bid, fixed, so now GIB will not pass, but in the particular case bids 6NT. Which is supposedly 4-7HCP, with 8+HCP it would bid 7NT.

Passed hand has options to express invite by using: - 3 in the major with 4+ cards support and 10-12TP - 1NT with 3 cards support and similar values. - 2NT is last by priority and basically doesn't deny having support in major opening. Probably it could be more convenient if shows 2-3 cards and not 2-4.

right, 4♥ should mean 4-5♥ and 2♠, max opening.