Jump to content

georgi

Yellows
  • Posts

    1,317
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About georgi

  • Birthday 01/02/1979

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    168103353
  • Yahoo
    g.parvanov@yahoo.com

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Bulgaria

georgi's Achievements

(6/13)

0

Reputation

  1. Hi, currently the 18b ACBL tournaments' schedule at BBO is as follows: all times are EDT 11:15AM 12:15PM 1:15PM 2:15PM 3:15PM 4:15PM 5:30PM 8:30PM 10:15PM All tournaments are MP scoring.
  2. I'm in good health :). I still work on GIBs, sorry that i missed to reply in forums. My skill level in BBO rarely deviates from intermediate or advance depend on the tourneys' restrictions i play in.
  3. Thanks for reporting. The reason is 2NT is supposedly pass/correct. Unless invitee has something unexpected to reveal. It's not expected North ( inviter ) to have such nice fit in opening not shown up to now, so he would support second suit and if opener decides to extend this suit would find better fit. Anyway, here the bug caused inviter to "forget" to correct back. Will be fixed in v34.
  4. Double shows -> -- 2-6 ♣; 2-6 ♦; 5-6 ♥; 2-6 ♠; 18-19 HCP; 22- total points At brief glance it need some polishing of shape, but there is explanation of the double. At least 6 cards in ♠ is no longer possible once hearts are no more then 6 as well. :)
  5. Thanks for reporting it. The problem was this hand was too strong to bid 3♠ ( major first ) and too short to bid 4♠ ( needed 5+ cards ). If N/S weren't vulnerable that hand would have overcall 3♣ instantly. Will be addressed about better solution ( or reducing length in major to bid game ).
  6. Thanks for reporting. There was a bug preventing GIB to rebid its minor with impossible reverse strength but highly unbalanced. So 1NT was found by mistake.
  7. If explanation is wrong, then will be either bug or bad explanation in general. When underneath call and explanation is ok for other(s), then current user had a problem with fetching the appropriate explanation by web server. Network ISP, browser, etc reasons. If that user has problem with GIB server, robot might just stuck and not play, but it won't provide different or wrong explanation. So somehow what you received was wrong. Correct and real explanations ( for all calls ) what were supposed you to receive are: 2NT ( Two NT opener. Could have 5M. -- 2-5 !C; 2-5 !D; 2-5 !H; 2-5 !S; 20-21 HCP ) - 3♣ ( Stayman -- 5+ total points ) 3♠ ( -- 2-5 !C; 2-5 !D; 2-3 !H; 4-5 !S; 20-21 HCP ) - 4♣ ( -- 5+ !C; 3- !S; 11-20 total points ) 4NT ( -- 2 !C; 2-5 !D; 2-3 !H; 4-5 !S; 20-21 HCP ) - 5♣ ( -- 6+ !C; 3- !S; 11 total points )
  8. Now for GIB the scheme is like that: 1NT - 2♥ - ? -> Double -> TOX, 4♠, 8-9HCP -> 3♥ -> 10+HCP 4♠, GF, no stopper ♥ -> 2NT - 3♣ - 3♥, 4♠ stopper ♥ -> 2NT - 3♣ - 3NT - 10+HCP, stopper ♥, no any major more promised, just like to play 3NT and show stopper in overcall. -> 2NT - 3♣ - 3♠ -> 5+ ♠ , INV, 8-9TP 1NT - 2♠ - ? -> Double - TOX , 4♥ 8-9HCP -> 3♠ -> 10+HCP 4♥, no stopper ♠ -> 2NT - 3♣ - 3♠ -> 4+♥ , stopper ♠ -> 2NT - 3♣ - 3♥ -> 5+ ♥, to play -> 2NT - 3♣ - 3NT -> as above, promised 10+HCP and stopper ♠, likes to play 3NT for both sequences 1N - 2M - 3NT -> 10+HCP, no stopper in overcall
  9. Once there is opening ( for easiness level 1 ) and it goes through GIB's hand it limits the points to 16TP ( once pass , unless something latter is specified ). Once partner bids something ( Double, natural suit ) and you pass again it limits additionally the hand.
  10. For GIB at the moment for some auctions if you cuebid their suit ( 4+ cards shown for sure ) once there is no approved suit for the pair ( yet ), you show length in partner's suit. For some auctions it shows only 13+TP and 4+ in your suit. But here it shows 2+ cards in partner's suit along your 4+ major cards.
  11. Who is supposedly controlling the hearts so North would be certain 3NT is still better/safe once partner shows 6+ minor and 3 major cards. What if South is ♠Axx ♥x ♦KQxxxx ♣(K/Q)xx then 3NT would be -1 if hearts are only 5-5 in opponents or -2 or worse?
  12. Thanks for reporting. Fixed in next version - v34. meaning of 2♠ would be -> -- 4- ♣; 6+ ♠; 8-12 total points
  13. Thanks for reporting. We found a bug in this loser(s) computing function, so next version will carry fix for this ( v34 ).
  14. 1M - 2m 2OM or bidding higher suit now asks GIB to have 16+TP. The hand in the diagram has 15TP, so it's very close, but still under the range to do so. Later 1♥ - 2♦ 2♥ - 3♥ 3♠/4m Cuebid might have stronger hand, but weaker trump, so that hand was unable to bid 3♥ or 3M instantly over 2minor GF. Will be addressed for some polish as such maximum hands of the minimum range should reveal themselves once partner shows interest on next round.
×
×
  • Create New...