Well, after all this hullabaloo, I really feel I must weigh in here. First of all, MtV took my comment a bit out of context, wihtout all the other parts to it. HWG: They did not allow Multi at the Cavendish Invitational Tournament and there was an article in one of the Daily Bulletins by Leckie excoriating it. They do not allow Multi at most ACBL events or the Trials. When they have allowed Multi they let us bring 20 pages of Defenses to the table that we can look at during the auction! We have been back & forth w/this more times than you all know &, quite frankly, this is a no-brainer for us. Just because a few players (pairs) wld like to use Multi, we do not want to be shouted down by the (vocal) minority, when we are trying to help the majority. We are trying to get young people interested in the game, not discourage them from playing due to arcane & tedious systems to prepare against. We are attempting to teach them bridge: how to think, how to count a hand, the logic behind bidding, etc. KFay's reference to our Teaching Table I do not quite understand. If he means that Fulvio, Benito, Curtis, Bob Hamman as well as a panoply of our distinguished other Hall-of-Famers & World Champions do not want to teach the Juniors Multi out of ignorance, well that is silly. When Juniorsbbo was started, there were rules that were set down & 1 of them was that we did not allow Multi, Therefore, we did not think it necessary to keep repeating it. Valerie Westheimer Paula Mittleman ;) B)