silent147

Thanks for the opinions though it is my poor English. ohioply says: This article, in Karen's Bridge Library Site, http://www.prairienet.org/bridge/ is my most basic 2/1 knowledgement in early days. I thought the content of this article to be a Lawrence style. pclayton says: Thanks your precious opinion. I will refer very much. One expert wrote article about this, Fred Gitelman. BBO->Explore Bridge->Bridge Library->English->Lectures->Transcript of Lecture 3 "Introduction to 2 over 1 Game Force - Bridge Base Online Lecture - May 30, 2001 He says, as follows. and says, So, I thought that the Lawrence style (Almost Game forcing=invitational 1-suiter hand) had the possibility that was not the main stream if it was assumed that it began to learn for the present. Is it true?

Hi, I am learning Two over One System in Japan. I want to learn the system called "Lawrence Style", so I read "Workbook on 2/1(1983)" and Mike's CDROM(2002). In Workbook, when responder rebids his suit(1S-2C;2D-3C), that is game invitation and 2C's game forcing is canceled. (so this is almost game focing.) But in CD, that sequence is not invitation, and still game focing. Today, does the Lawrence Style mean "3C is forcing"?