buddyshah

At our local club this bidding took place. Both partnerships on table was new. North dealer and opens bidding N E S W 1♣ 1♠ 2♥ 2♠ 3♥ pass 3♠ pass 3NT pass 4♦ pass 4♥ pass 4NT pass 5♣*pass# 5♥ pass 6♥ p p p Playing without screen Open and loud enquiry by Ease about 5♣bid, South thought for a while and replied 0314, North having thought they are played 1430 raised 5♥ to 6 . Coontract 6!H making 7. Diretor was called and director ruled against 6♥ bid. unauthorised information. Is this really unauthorised information? or it is legal usable information coming to north by Enthusiatic east .

During April Netcast from Bombay --With the permission of the Organising body and Technical comittee and tournament director We had 1 Card reader at the Table . His / her job was to announce the card on the table after the release, and this did help to a great extent for the VG operator. Still i agree some claims are very difficult to put in by a vg operator.

I conduct regular tournaments. Most of the time Kibitz is not allowed. though i would like to keep the tables open For Kibitz where STAR players are playing Is it possible with Bridgebase's Constantly Upgraded Software to Allow Kibitz on some Tables?