zgrywus

Thanks for comments, appreciate all of them. What I realized is that sense of humor is a very sensitive matter. When I saw a self-comment like "am I dumb..." I was sure it was not what the player meant, he/she was trying to excuse unlucky/bad play in funny way. That was why, I felt myself authorised to comment following the line. As already stated, it was not my intention to be offensive,(malicious at last, but not offensive). Thanks for opening my eyes. I will send my deepest apologies to the player (unless I'm blacklisted by her/him - then my message will be ignored). Finally let me say something you have already known: Am I dumb...

Agree whatever U say. There were not my intention to offence any player. What I just did was to follow opponent remark, in a way I found funny. Nickname reserve it's rights.

Of course I'm, praud, praud, praud. I do not think it was "unkindeness", but a funny comment. Fell free to judge..

A while latter I said following: (Just kidding,no offence), td makes no incestigation, but withdraw me from the tournament.

Do not agree, whenn somebidy says/freely admits he/she a dunmb ass, he/she is. Period. Might discuss why he/she is a one, but;s not the subject.

Hi, I was playing one of free tournaments, (I think it's does'n matter which one, after one of the board, my righty said: "******→Stół: am I dumb...". Now plse judge if my comment was rude/funny:→Stół: tell us something we don't know.. Than I was accoused for calling the payer "a dumb", withdrown from the tournaent. Should I feel myself guilty,or just give a s... of it? (not suopporter of political correctness). Real name of my opponent is hidden couse it's not relevant to the case.

Hi substitute players, my suggestion is that when declaring willingness to substitute any tournaments, you don't have addtional options. What about options like: I will participate any IMP tournament, or I will participate any MP tournament, or scoring doees not matter, willing to participate any way.

I would open 1♦, and if played w/polish standards/players rebid 2NT over 2♣which shows precisely 11-14(15) 4441, if 2Nt is not an option I have to rebid 2♦.

Thx for reply. That was probably before 6 aces rkcb has been invented. :)

Steve2005 wrote: The person who bids 4N Blackwood is in charge (this is called being the Captain) if they said 5♠ you should respect that and pass. Bilw55 wrote: Technically, your partner's bidding does mean that he wants to play in 5♠, and so you should pass. Really? Always thought tt 4Nt agreed hearts in that sequence. If so 5 spades can not be passed. Agreed w Bilw55: Booted the wrong player.

Since you have exhausted yourself of your club stoppers and trump, the 6016 hand would be able to claim at that point. Ok, I meant draw last trump, so still have 2 of them in hand and in dumy :)

Suggest following line: A♠and ♠ruff. A♥ ♣ to dummy ♥ finesse draw trump clear ♣ small ♦ from both hands Sometimes W has 6016 or similar w/stiff ♦ honor

Not so seldom IMO. Happened to me as well, declarer duck when he has 8 tricks (playing 3Nt) and the J suppose to be the 9th trick, But his holding is xxx-xxx at a side suit, so switch at the 3rd trick could be obvious (or at least much more probably) than at the 2nd trick. With my regular partner we came back to use attitude signals. But I'm also curious what the rest think.

Can I have more explanations about bidding? Especially what does 5NT mean? Looks like declarer thinks that they have all key cards and he’s investigating grand. What would be the meaning of 5 spades, an Q♥ asks? Is than 5NT asking for Kings outside spades (hard to imagine defense problem if declarer is missing a minor K). From the other side ♠- ♥ADxxxx ♦KDx ♣Kxxx isn't 6♣ proper call as the grand slam try?

assuming that S own the 9♣, he can win anyway: ♠ - ♥ - ♦ A753 ♣ 64 ♠ - ♥ x ♦ KDx ♣ 9x Now declarer plays ♥ (a club from dummy) and E is squeezed (♠ -♥ -♦ W862♣ A10)