pgcto

Given that regular tournaments allow reseating it seems like it would not be difficult to allow it for automated tournaments. In my situation which has happened once or twice before I had several windows open and connected to the internet and the BBO one was the only one that closed which makes me suspect it was a BBO problem.

I was playing in an "Express- Free Automated Fun" tournament which has a 30 second limit for bids or plays. I had just made my bid when I got bumped out of BBO. I was able to log back in well within the 30 second time limit but it did not reseat me and even when I went to the tournament, although it was in yellow which usually means I am registered, I could not join. Is there a way to rejoin the tournament since it seems unfair to be charged with not completing a tournament due to a glitch in BBO

Similar to the Just Declare Solitaire game I would like to see a Just Defend Solitaire game to give me an option to practice my defense. The hands would be scored so if you found the optimum defense you would get the maximum score.

Why can't individual users see the number of games played and number finished values. They are obviously accessible all the time.

My question is: Can I as a user determine when did the tournaments that were not completed occurred? With effort I can go through the list of recent tournaments and find the ones that I did complete but it would be nice to be able to just get a list.

My question was can I as a user see the list of tournaments that qualify for the TCR. With regard to your comment I have considerably more than 6 tournaments. On my Recent Tournaments tab I have over 50 tournaments over a month and a half but there is no indication which ones are included in the calculation. That recent tournament tab includes Team games and daylong tournaments which I believe are not included while it does not mention tournaments that were not finished.

Is is possible to determine how many tournaments are being included in your TCP. Is it possible to find when the tournaments that were not completed occurred. I had a couple of problems but it seems like a long time ago but my percentage has not increased.

I enjoy the Express Free Automated Fun Tournaments since they give me a chance to play with people from all over the world and people of varying abilities. I also like the fact that comments are disabled so we don't have the berating of other players at the table which is so often a feature of casual games. Unfortunately this evening I had the situation where a player took advantage of a loophole in the system to make disparaging comments to me. He used the comment section in the claim feature to accuse me of cheating. Therefore I suggest that the comment feature in claims be disabled in these tournaments since I hardly ever see anyone use it. (If a claim isn't obvious without an explanation most player just don't claim).

I agree, in retrospect, that I wasn't going to get any additional information from the response to the cue bid but it would be nice if the GIB bid matched the description.

I had this hand recently playing against 3 robots https://tinyurl.com/y8qvtu8z where my partner opened 5♣. Since I had 4 winners in the other 3 suits slam looked good - maybe even 7. The bidding note for the robot said 5♦ was a cue bid so I bid it. The robot then passed! My question is how can the robot be programmed so that it passes a cue bid?

I agreee that the Swiss team results could gain a lot by mirroring the way team matches are reported. It would be useful to report the results as soon as all tables have completed a hand. The report should include the result for both pairs in the team and the net number of IMPs obtained. At the end of the game the summary should show the result for each hand the team played including the net number of IMPs. The comparison to all the other teams that played the hand is interesting but I would prefer it to be secondary.