Gpm_bg

Maybe he lead honour becouse on 3♥ and 3NT bids no double from partner, which could mean only fit support , no high honour and additional control for back ♥. Normal lead as previous people said, leading from honour is good to can catch second K or J in dummy or in declarer

Q♦ prevent from K10x in dummy making two !d even partner and declarer are with 2 cards, and moslty if partner is singleton ♦, you both will make connect in ♥ probably. At closed cards if Q!d win, you can pull A♦ and play J♦ which may discard for values in ♥ with already shown distrubution, i don't see why my Q♦ lead that i mention up is not logical ? sometimes book help , which doesn't mean that i don't like to support partner, but following 2♠ 3nt and this RHO is not drunk, u should risk with Q

5♣ 4♠ 3♦ 1♥ with 5-4-2-2 could be back 2nt on 2♣ pts should be 13-14 not more, he could bid 2!d as 4SF if 15-16+ or to pass with 10-12

sometimes when decalarer is not familiar with styles of leading on defense pair, is normal to risk with under Ace lead. leading under Ace is not definetly wrong, usually appear question suddenly : to cover or not, to jump with K or not

i would lead Q♦ and to wait to win in any configuration 3-2-2 in any neither partner and opps. Jump 3nt show or single control with long suit or balance strong card with 1-2 controls in ♠. 2♠ strong and distribution depends of vulnarability of both pairs, but i will choose Q♦

Certainly pass , nothing additional as information, even on 1♦, could be weak with nothing, or weak with ♥/♠ interest with ♠Kxxx ♥Jxxx ♦Qxxx ♣x rebid 1nt will be lead to doubt did he need to continue bidding becouse you can hold : ♠Axx ♥KQx ♦A10x ♣J109x when is most typicall on 1♦of partner to continue overbidding I will pas, but if i wasnt't , i'll bid 1♠, and to expect to excuse to my partner after game

[hv=n=sxxhxxxxdkjxcxxxx&w=sqjxhaxxd10xcajxxx&e=sakxxxhkqxdqckqxx&s=s10xhj10xxdaxxxxxxc]399|300|[/hv] Opener is E : with different kind of bids 1♣Strong or 1♠2/1,sayc and etc. IN the game i was playing in the bids were : E S W N 1♠ 2♦ X pas 3♣ 3♦ 3♠ pas And they can go to slam level or to finish just to 4♠ The lead was 7th on strong ♦ card, K♦ won, but not understand signal for probably void in partner and back J♦ What is your mind about that kind lead : Killing or mostly or suicide The slam is almost undisputable if lead is from N

Hi, that is problem not with BBO, but i like to share and search for help from everyone who can help me. Situation is next: I have computer with Windows 2000 Server, who had attack from hackers, who make Computer management User's List to be hidden. Users still exist but they can't be controled as change passowrd and removed. You could only enter new one using Security Options about rules who to own modify and etc things over folders or files. If u forgot probably password of some user, he practical is gone for system, administrator can't change becouse he can't see it in list with these options. I probably could not explain situation perfectly but if someone is interested could email me on gpp@neochim.bg or to clip me on my BBO user name : gpm_bg I'll read forum also but some information could not be wrote here so there is many way if someone want to help. Thanks in advance to everyone who have ideas or cure for that :D))

[hv=n=s2h3dq108765ckq1054&w=s6hkq10862djc98762&e=sq10985hj54da2caj3&s=sakj743ha97dk943c]399|300|[/hv] opener is east not matter vulnerabillity. W N E S 1♠ pas 2♥ pas pas (X) pas (3♥) pas 4♦ pas 4♠ pas 5♥ pas 6♦ pas pas pas Enjoy!!!!

[hv=d=e&v=b&n=sajxxhkxxxxdqckxx&s=shaqtxdakjxxxxxca]133|200|Scoring: IMP p-1♦-p-1♥-p-??[/hv] In the some kind of precision club, where, after 1♣, answers are 1♥-0-4 pts any distribution, 1♠- 4-7 any distribution, 1NT- 7-10 any distribution. 1♦ - 10+ GF definately and any distribution also and etc bids, the game will be lead like this ........... E S W N pas (1♣) pas (1♦) pas 2♦ pas 2♥ pas (3♠) pas (4♣) pas (5♣) pas (5♠) pas 6♦ pas 7♦ pas 7♥ pas ???????? bids meaning 1♣ - 16+ ->1♦ - 10+ ->2♦ - 5+ 16-20 pts -> 2♥ - 5+ 10-13pts (14+ 3♥) - >3♠ - Splinter, 1st control + 4th as we bid 2♦ not 2♥ - > 4♣ - Cue bid and control ♣ - > 5♣ - Confirming of 1st control in suit ♣ ->5♠ - Confirming 1st control ♠ with eventually or A or void, depends of the opener splinter ->6♦->continues lenght of ♦ to 6+ and 1st control there - > 7♦, giving information of shortness in opener suit, rejecting probable fit 6+1 less - >7♥- propose for a contract ->7NT could be bid as the partner counting Q♦ as important card as addition of eventually AKxxxx and the chances of squeez with ♥ and non less chances ♦ to be 3-3 with 6th lenght in opener could count ->5♥ with 1♠ with 2+♣ with risky ♦ 7♥ sounds like 99% sure if only direct ruff with unnormal distribution, could take the risk and hope for good ♦ distribution and bid 7NT. So that is my desicion, 7nt could be try.

[hv=d=s&v=b&n=s76hq3dakq43cak109&w=s432h865d92cq8653&e=skq85hk1072d1087cj2&s=saj109haj94dj65c74]399|300|Scoring: IMP[/hv] Examine that game and find the way how 7♦ could be reached and complited. In my case the lead was ♣5 Is there a chance 7NT to be done also with squeeze

[hv=d=n&v=n&n=sk73hj8dk10987642c&w=sahkq10654dacakq104&e=s109842hadj5cj9732&s=sqj65h9732dq3c865]399|300|Scoring: IMP[/hv] That was for sky club tournament August 1st. The bids was good but, founding grand slam at 7♥. The score but was interested. 12 Imps, on this on first view very easy to catch this slam on level 7 for 7♣ ; 7♥ ; 7NT. The bids were : N E S W 3♦ pas pas (4♦) pas 4♠ pas 4NT pas 5♦ pas 7♥ Grand slam is cherry of the bridge, but you need brave and knowledge also :P)

Game downthere is a exaple of using Michel convension: N ♠xxx ♥KQxxx ♦AKJx ♣x S ♠x ♥Axxxx ♦xx ♣Axxxx Bids were : W N E S 1♠ 2♠ 3♠ 4♠ pas 6♥ pas pas X pas pas pas as u could see simple and beatifull game. Give your example if u like imagination in bridge and if u want to share with the others :)))))))))))))))