ali quarg

You're in a GF, what's wrong with 2♠?

[hv=pc=n&v=b&n=sthakjt72dq7caqt8&d=s&v=0&b=11&a=1cp1Dp1Sp2Dp3cp?]133|200|[/hv]

What happens to 23 balanced?

Natural denying a Weak NTish type hand, implying long ♣

[hv=pc=n&v=b&n=sthakjt72dq7caqt8&d=s&v=0&b=11&a=1cp1Dp1Sp?]133|200|[/hv]

One I didn't quite get right playing Transfer Walsh 2+♣, may have 5♦ IMPS [hv=pc=n&v=b&n=sthakjt72dq7caqt8&d=s&v=0&b=11&a=1cp?]133|200|[/hv]

If you play Majors always first then 1♥ and keep rebidding diamonds with 9+ playing tricks unless ♥ are supported.

Margubnally too weak for me to open and I wont pre-empt with this balanced hand

You are in a GF with opener looking to slam in ♥ or NT. I'd treat 3♥ as slam invitational with a self-sustaining suit; still plenty of space to establish whether you have controls in all suits and switch to NT if applicable.

Contract as expected and I guess you made 4 since the opponents failed to take out the trumps giving you 2 ruffs

It looks like 6NT is the optimal contract, so cue-bidding looks like the way to get there

♣ by default. If I had long ♠ I would have shown earlier/be bidding 4♠, ♥ support would be shown with 3♦, and I have no idea how it could be ♦

That's why you need strong partnership agreements. Passing 3♦ is more of an issue as you can always raise 4♦ to 5♣

Struggling to count to 23+ total points (max. 20) so not a 2♣ opening? I'm not sure the robot can count either if the description is correct A 1♠ opening for most ending in 4♠

North has to force and a self-sustaining 7 card suit with 13hcp is enough to go to 4♠