pdfprime

fwiw, this was in the free weekend survivor game on Sunday. every other GIB also passed in the above auction. For opener rebids, GIB did not pass 3♠, it did not pass 3♦, it did not pass 4♦, it did pass 6♥.

P-1♥-1♠-2♠ P-3♣-all pass... 2♠ was alerted as limit raise or better. My 3♣ bid was alerted by GIB as 4+♣ 5+♥ 21-HCP, 13-22 total points. ♠95 ♥Q65 ♦K73 ♣KQT82 ♠AT82 ♥AKJ93 ♦ ♣AJ93 edit: I guess I cannot edit title. GIB

Maybe not answering your question, but if you pull up a hand in a browser (export handviewer link), all of the relevant info is there about names, cards played, etc in the url. pc|HK| plays Heart King mb|2N| makes a 2NT bid.. just look through the url and you'll see most of what you need to see. I change the cards around all the time to make more interesting hands in post-mortems.

I have done some analysis with the time stamped table data. My first pass was to add up the times assigned by BBO to the players. This resulted in average player time equal to 1/4 of the total time of the session. That made no sense since that would mean there was no delay for anyone. We tend to play Howells with 2 bds/round and pair 1 (1NS which is stationary) was always slower than everyone else. Well, they bid first every single round. And if they are actually fast players, they will get dinged for the time they sat around for *finishing early*. The first post above is about the same time I saw the error. There is a quick on-the-spot fix for TDs looking at total time. If a round ended and there is a board adjust and some side is claiming slow play.... If the summed times for all 4 players (must quickly assess yourself) is more than the round time, the excess has been attributed to the opening bidder of the round. Example round summary: North Nate 6:00 South Stu 5:00 East Ed 4:00 West Wally 2:00 and this was a 14 minute round. A total of 17:00 minutes shows. Ludicrous! The opening bidder of the round was charged with 3 minutes of time that they should not have been. If it was Nate or Stu, things don't look so bad. 8 minutes vs 6 minutes. If it was Ed, then Nate and Stu are problematic. 11 minutes vs 3 minutes Also note that declarer has more actions when deciding on slow-play, but this example is a quick way to check what is going on. If the round does not time out, once again you can sum the BBO calculated times listed and then look at the time stamps for sitting for the 1st board and resulting the last board. Any excess in the BBO calcs was assigned to the opening bidder of the first board. peace, fritz edit: I am not sure how it counts time for requested explanations and TD calls. I do have a method for calculating time/action. And it has been very consistent by player across many sessions.